2010 Lowest Paying College Degrees Includes Education Three Times

Education Degrees are Among Worst-Paid Careers - Desks Photo by Wesley Fryer -Creative Commons
Education Degrees are Among Worst-Paid Careers - Desks Photo by Wesley Fryer -Creative Commons
Education is on Lynn O'Shaughnessy's 2010 worst paying career degree list multiple times. A Slate columnist flirts with the idea of firing 80% of teachers.

On her August 12, 2010 Yahoo Finance column, Lynn O'Shaughnessy lists the "20 Worst-Paying College Degrees in 2010" one day after Slate's Ray Fisman wondered, " Is firing (a lot of) teachers the only way to improve public schools? " What is interesting about the two columns is that both show how that American teachers are undervalued, while the comments for both columns show that people recognize that teacher pay does not align with the work expected from the profession.

20 Worst Paying College Degrees in 2010

According to O'Shaughnessy, "If you'd rather end up with one of the best-paying college degrees, you'll have to major in something that requires a lot of math classes." One would hope that math is part of an education degree, particularly for math teachers, but education is listed three times:

  • Elementary education is second on the list.
  • Special education is tenth on the list.
  • Education is fourteenth on the list.

The range for all of the jobs is based on averages, but the starting pay for any of the education college degrees listed was $31,000 to $36,000, and the mid-career salary range was $44,000 to $55000. This might explain why so many teachers get graduate degrees in education, although in "Clean Out Your Desk," Ray Fisman suggests that in terms of helping teachers become great, "a master's degree in education [helps] not at all." (Slate, August 11, 2010.)

Will Firing Teachers Improve Education?

Those graduates with education degrees have more than just poverty to worry about; the jobs they get may not be secure if current research is true. According to Fisman, "a thick stack of pink slips are needed to improve schools." Ineffective teachers hurt schools, and the Staiger study that Fisman refers to seems to conclude that there are a lot of ineffective teachers.

In "Searching for Effective Teachers with Imperfect Information," researcher Douglas O. Staiger says that schools should hire "only the most effective teachers, and do it quickly." Staiger admits that this strategy may have some "practical limitations." Schools are really faced with a choice: hire effective teachers, or help the enthusiastic education graduates who are willing to work in a low paying field become more effective teachers.

Reactions to O'Shaughnessy and Fisman's Articles

Readers of the Yahoo Finance and Slate columns responded strongly to the ideas presented in the articles, and many were defensive of teachers. Yahoo user Fran had one of the highest rated answers when she noted, " There is something intangible missing from this equation. " Her statement could apply to both articles. Education, a career field that touches so many, is surprisingly low paying, and that doesn't make sense to a lot of people who see how teachers impact children. That 80% of people would choose a career in which they were ineffective also doesn't make sense, and there is something intangible missing from the equation of what makes a good teacher.

In Slate's reader reaction section, Tim Duenkel asked, "Who would want to go into a profession where only 20% of the people get to keep their jobs after a couple years?" Of course, the field of people who would choose to enter such a threatened career track would not be helped by the low pay that O'Shaughnessy listed. Slate reader Chad Ervin pointed out, "These people make 20-30k per year, that is why it is easy to blame them." His numbers are a lower than what O'Shaughnessy found, but his statement brings up an interesting question about how teacher pay connects with teacher accountability.

Lynn O'Shaughnessy is summarizing economic research, and Ray Fisman is expanding on education research. Neither author suggested that teachers should be at the bottom of the pay scale, and it is noteworthy that although many readers commented about specific problems they had in education, there is a lot of people who respect teachers and value a career that is inspired by passion, not pay.

Sources:

"20 Worst-Paying College Degrees in 2010" by Lynn O'Shaughnessy was published by Yahoo! Finance on August 12, 2010. Reader comments responding to the article were accessed August 12, 2010, in the comment section directly under the Yahoo article.

"Clean Out Your Desk: Will Firing Teachers Improve Education" by Ray Fisman was published by Slate on August 11, 2010. Reader comments responding to the article were accessed August 12, 2010, in the comment section directly under the Slate article.

"Searching for Effective Teachers with Imperfect Information" by Douglas O. Staiger was presented at Dartmoth College on May 6, 2010. The Point Point used in the presentation was accessed on August 12, 2010. The quotation comes from slide 12 in the presentation.

Alex Sharp, Jack Ambers

Alex Sharp - Alex Sharp is a teacher who has been keeping Suite101 readers up to date with the latest in audio- and e-book gadgetry since 2008.

rss
Advertisement

Comments

Aug 12, 2010 12:11 PM
Guest :
There is a simple reason why teachers are lowest paid...Note it, Fix it.

‘Race to the Top’ Leaves Teachers, Free Market Economics & Progress on ‘Soft War’ Behind

There are some great teachers, and even some great Teacher Preparation programs, but these are random occurrences where consistency is essential. The reason is simple: Professional Education is absent fundamental standards found in all other professions. There is no standard curriculum, no sincere, systemic effort to identify Best Instructional Practices, no guidance in what and how needs to be further researched and developed. To be called a profession it is imperative that a profession, one way or another, needs to convene a rolling forum to collect and prioritize the core content of principles and practices that every member ought to know. An honest Grammar of Teaching. Ironically, Teachers worldwide are being held to standards for annual yearly progress (AYP) of their students. They also are being expected to raise economic competitiveness, to promote tolerance and civility, and reduce hostilities. They fight the “soft war” against ignorance and provincialism every day, the war that the military has conceded that guns and drone bombers cannot win. Meanwhile, Professors, Learned Societies & commercial schools, and some painfully self-serving non-profit foundations and Universities never even address the fundamental need for greater investment in solid pedagogic technology. The Departments of Education and several of the world’s leading national security divisions should sponsor an ongoing “virtual convention” of the world’s leading educators to consider and endorse a covenant of currently scattered principles and more importantly prescriptive practices that work at several levels. Ideally this should be done on a website that transparently allows these to be challenged, tweaked and further specified for different age-grade-situational-cultural conditions. This effort to improve the quality and impact of Education worldwide is an urgent orphan cause with no natural constituencies. This entire process would cost very little if we do so collaboratively. Ironically, as new schools open in the developing world by NGO’s such as the great humanitarian Greg Mortenson, no one, he included, seem to give any thought to improving the pedagogic technology and educational delivery systems that need to be and easily can be customized for smart tech savvy and dirt floor classrooms. Paradoxically there have been some great breakthroughs in pedagogy in the last 40 years. These new age methods are little known because they are smothered by thousands of scattered publications. Culling, parsing and tweaking these is near impossible for small groups or individual teachers – it is analogous to picking your own wining stock portfolio - but it would be a “duck soup” for doctoral level educators and psychologists. In less then 3 months a preliminary algorithm and list of provisionally supported Best Instructional Practices could be identified and promulgated for further evaluation. Please help by joining the narrative both here and at some early test websites. Realize please that what you will read here I simply sat down and made up from one person’s knowledge, mind studies, experience and relatively limited empirical research. It could be and would be much better if you added your voice. Sources in process:
1. http://bestmethodsofinstruction.com/?
2.http://teacherprofessoraccountability.ning.com/main/invitation/new?xg_s ource=msg_wel_network.
3. https://bestpracticesteachers.groupsite.com/blog

Anthony V. Manzo, Ph.D./ Professor Emeritus/ avmanzo@aol.com




1
Advertisement
Advertisement