water is more dangerous than fire
- babylove23
- lbondx
This archived discussion is "read only".
» babylove23 - English
I need information based on this new discusion.If you can help,please send the information quickly. Thank you very much.
-- posted by babylove23
» lbondx - Re: English
In response to message posted by babylove23:The message I received was water is more dangerous than fire...
That's an interesting suggestion. I think it would depend on whether one were caught in a housefire or a flood, since fire would likely seem more dangerous than water in a fire, and water more dangerous than fire during a flood. I am not really sure how one would go about testing such an idea. I know that fire is usually a fast, short-lived phenomenon, while water can be quick as in a flood, or slow, and over time, water can dig huge canyons (like the Grand Canyon). So in that event, water would seem to be more powerful!
Any other ideas out there?
-- posted by lbondx
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.