Speaking of Legolas...

Read the article this discussion is about


  1. DrkGodess
  2. desertblue
  3. y2kgirlz1
  4. y2kgirlz1
  5. KittyKat89
  6. MABB
  7. Michael_Martinez
  8. Ivandare
  9. Aerlinnel
  10. Michael_Martinez

This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.


« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »


Top 45.   Apr 6, 2002 7:40 PM

» DrkGodess - I'm still lost....

So I read this article thinking I might come to some sort of conculsion about Legolas's age, but i don't think i got anywhere. All i think i know is that he was a relatively young elf. Was it 500 yrs old or what? Help...

-- posted by DrkGodess



Top 46.   Apr 10, 2002 8:58 AM

» desertblue - eowyn

In response to message posted by DrkGodess:

I think it's quite novel that Eowyn and Aragorn don't get together. The usual epic format would have them meet, fall for each other, separate and have their own experiences, reunite joyfully after much growth and travail, then marry. That's the 'satisfying' ending we expect.

But Tolkien's situation is more complicated and layered through time. Aragorn's love life began long before we met him.

It is such a surprise the first time that he is already involved...of course, I was twelve, so who knows if I might have picked up on the clues.

I think the couples work out just fine. Eowyn is really too young and unlearned for Aragorn (my opinion). And poor Faramir just lost his brother, father, and stewardship. He is an incredible character often overlooked. I'm glad he tames the shieldmaiden.

jill

-- posted by desertblue



Top 47.   Apr 10, 2002 1:26 PM

» y2kgirlz1 - Re: I'm still lost....

In response to message posted by DrkGodess:
legolas is actually 2776 years old, as proved in the book if u do extensive history on his father, and how old he was during wars..it goes really far back. but, hes actually 2776 years old, thats still REALLY young for an elf.

-- posted by y2kgirlz1



Top 48.   Apr 10, 2002 1:26 PM

» y2kgirlz1 - Re: Re: Legolas's age

In response to message posted by Michael_Martinez:

thank u u r SO RIGHT!

-- posted by y2kgirlz1



Top 49.   Apr 21, 2002 6:00 AM

» KittyKat89 - Re: Re: I'm still lost....

In response to message posted by y2kgirlz1:


hes so young looking. *sigh* he's so hot......lol smile

-- posted by KittyKat89



Top 50.   Jun 25, 2002 4:23 PM

» MABB - M MARTINEZ >I LIKE SO MUCH YOUR ARTICLES

First which nothing wanted to greet it and to congratulate it by I articles is fantastic the way in which described this so charming personage of the book of tolkien, since I believe that very few of that read the books that we have not felt curiosity by legolas
Danaeae Chile
pd> excuse for englishish, is very bad

-- posted by MABB



Top 51.   Jun 26, 2002 2:50 PM

» Michael_Martinez - Re: M MARTINEZ >I LIKE SO MUCH YOUR ARTICLES

In response to message posted by MABB:

Thank you. Don't worry about your English. My Spanish, I am sorry to say, would probably not be as good as your English.

-- posted by Michael_Martinez



Top 52.   Jul 29, 2002 11:58 PM

» Ivandare - Legolas and the balrog

Now if I've got this right the balrog was the big fire thingy and I am pretty sure I read somewhere that fire is one of the few things that can kill elves.

That may be why Legolas became flustered at the sight of it.

-- posted by Ivandare



Top 53.   Aug 11, 2002 8:40 AM

» Aerlinnel - Re: Legolas and the balrog

"'It was a Balrog of Morgoth,' said Legolas; 'of all elf-banes the most deadly, save the One who sits in the Dark Tower'" ("The Mirror of Galadriel", FotR).

Yes, the Balrog is the big fire thingy. Not sure why fire would be so particularly deadly to Elves (although you are corroborated by Legolas himself in the quote above), but perhaps it's because the Firstborn have a bad history with Balrogs: Fëanor's, Fingon's, and Glorfindel's deaths; Maedhros's capture; the Dagor Bragollach and Nirnaeth Arnoediad; the sack of Gondolin.

-- posted by Aerlinnel



Top 54.   Aug 12, 2002 9:09 AM

» Michael_Martinez - Re: Re: Legolas and the balrog

In response to message posted by Aerlinnel:

I think some people have the impression that Elves are impervious to cold, since Legolas didn't seem to be too put out by the blizzard on Caradhras. However, not all of the Noldor suvrived the crossing of the Helcaraxe, and Cirdan's mariners went down with their ship in the distant north, when they tried to rescue Arvedui. And then people may also be thinking of the Dagor Bragollach, when rivers of fire consumed the Noldorin warriors camped on the plain of Ard-galen in the First Age.

Tolkien's Elves were certainly capable of enduring great environmental hardship which Men and Hobbits (and even Dwarves) would have struggled with or perhaps failed under, but I think it's fair to say that fire is more immediately destructive to anything than snow. Elves were not particularly susceptible to fire. They were simply no less so than other creatures.

-- posted by Michael_Martinez



« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »

Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.