Billionaire Saviours

Read the article this discussion is about


  1. millertyme24
  2. jerrib
  3. RJ2525
  4. RJ2525
  5. jerrib
  6. RJ2525

This archived discussion is "read only".


Top 1.   Apr 15, 2001 10:38 AM

» millertyme24 - great article

I found Mr. Robinsons article to be very articulate. He took a different and risky approach to the truth. Money talks BABY.

-- posted by millertyme24

Permalink Print Discussion Print Discussion Email Discussion Email Discussion Join the latest discussions Join the latest discussions
Top 2.   Apr 16, 2001 10:11 AM

» jerrib - But why Bill Gates?

Why not Jeff Bezos?

-- posted by jerrib

Permalink Print Discussion Print Discussion Email Discussion Email Discussion Join the latest discussions Join the latest discussions
Top 3.   Apr 17, 2001 8:53 AM

» RJ2525 - Re: great article

In response to message posted by millertyme24:

Mr. Miller,

Thanks for replying. Money does talk, baby. ;)

P.S. thanks for finding me to be articulate. Writers love that @%*&.
R.J.

-- posted by RJ2525

Permalink Print Discussion Print Discussion Email Discussion Email Discussion Join the latest discussions Join the latest discussions
Top 4.   Apr 17, 2001 8:57 AM

» RJ2525 - Re: But why Bill Gates?

In response to message posted by jerrib:

Hello again, Jerri. Bill Gates is a good fit for a Major League owner because he wouldn't interfere too much (he's got bigger things to worry about!), and Jeff Bezos is losing his shirt in Amazon.com, so my Magic 8-ball thinks that his chances of being a great owner are DOUBTFUL. R.J.

-- posted by RJ2525

Permalink Print Discussion Print Discussion Email Discussion Email Discussion Join the latest discussions Join the latest discussions
Top 5.   Apr 18, 2001 3:04 PM

» jerrib - Re: Re: But why Bill Gates?

In response to message posted by RJ2525:

Really. I thought Jeff was finally making headway. You're right. Bill Gates would be good, because he likes to advertise his "accomplishments." But why not the Mariners?

-- posted by jerrib

Permalink Print Discussion Print Discussion Email Discussion Email Discussion Join the latest discussions Join the latest discussions
Top 6.   Apr 21, 2001 12:58 PM

» RJ2525 - Re: Re: Re: But why Bill Gates?

In response to message posted by jerrib:

jerrib,

Call me soft, but I would prefer Gates taking up the cause of a bottom-of-the-barrel small-market team rather than a mid-market team in Seattle. The Mariners already have a spanking new ballpark and solid ownership. The Twins desperately need a new ballpark; the Royals and Pirates just need to spend money to keep their young players. R.J.

-- posted by RJ2525

Permalink Print Discussion Print Discussion Email Discussion Email Discussion Join the latest discussions Join the latest discussions

Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.