|
|
|
|
|
10 and ½ COMMON MYTHS ABOUT MUSLIMS (in no particular order): Re: Re: Re: Your References, PleaseRead the article this discussion is about
This archived discussion is "read only".
» BrotherJones - Re: Re: Re: Your References, Please In response to Re: Re: Your References, Please posted by Pinky102:You reference yourself and you laugh out loud at Armstrong's credentials? I did not laugh out loud at her credentials. I question whether any outward credentials would allow a person to be a 'highly respected' judge of the inner working of the Spirit in a persons' life. I see little or no value in her enterprise to label Christians. And your idea of listing sources who are supposed to attest to her expertise at labeling believers is contrived logic. It matters not how important it is to you to label those who disagree with you as fundamentalists. All of those, like you, who interpret scripture as non-historical can attend your own parties and let fly your own unbiblical opinions and you are certainly free to esteem each other. We are not dealing in an area of exacting precise learning similar to mathmatics or science, but of faith and loyalty to the story of Jesus Christ. However, you are getting very close to helping define the very small amount of difference that separates fundamentalism from historic Christianity. When I have entered into this bantering to describe and place a value on Liberals, (which to this point has not risen to the level of a book) I haven't resorted any other 'scholarly mudslinger.' My opinions have been my own. -- posted by BrotherJones
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|