The meaning of life ?: Re: Re: Re: The Origin of Species(1859)

Read the article this discussion is about


  1. swinny

This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.



Top 1.   Feb 4, 2004 6:23 AM

» swinny - Re: Re: Re: The Origin of Species(1859)

In response to message posted by Franc28:

The assertion by our anti-religious friends here is absolutely anti-scientific. The thought that the evolutionary theory of the eye has not been proven and is only a ridiculous concept of an evolutionary timescale. Absurd. Even Dawrin said so himself!

Anatomy, Physiology & Pathology of the Human Eye
http://www.tedmontgomery.com/the_eye/
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba...
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultrane...
ESSAYS ON ORIGINS:
Can Evolution Produce an Eye? Not a Chance!
by Dr. David N. Menton, Ph.D.
This version copyright (c) 1994 by:
http://www.redbay.com/org/creation/eye.t...

-- posted by swinny


Post this Discussion Post to facebook Add this Discussion Post to del.icio.us! Digg this Discussion Post furl this Discussion Post Add this Discussion Post to Reddit Add this Discussion Post to Technorati Add this Discussion Post to Newsvine Add this Discussion Post to Windows Live Add this Discussion Post to Yahoo Add this Discussion Post to StumbleUpon Add this Discussion Post to BlinkLists Add this Discussion Post to Spurl Add this Discussion Post to Google Add this Discussion Post to Ask Add this Discussion Post to Squidoo


Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.