This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.
» Red - Re: Re: rumors of adultry and bigamy...
In response to message posted by Mugwump53:
John,
Oops! I didn't see that she was never really First Lady in the info that I read, but maybe I overlooked it. However, it was Rachel Donelson Jackson. How do you know all this about the many First Ladies?
-- posted by Red
» Mugwump53 - Re: Re: Re: rumors of adultry and bigamy...
In response to message posted by Red:As to my knowledge of First Ladies, you might be interested to know that I am the editor of Presidents & First Ladies on that excellent site, Suite 101. {G}
Also, check out an article I wrote in March 2002:
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/4996...
Keep these excellent questions coming. I am enjoying them (when I get to them before Ossining, that is!)
-- posted by Mugwump53
» Red - Re: Re: Re: Re: rumors of adultry and bigamy...
In response to message posted by Mugwump53:John,
I know you are the CE of Presidents and First Ladies. I am your ME. I enjoy your topic, but had never read your article on Rachel Donelson Jackson. It is excellent. I learned a lot from it.
I enjoy posting the questions. I am trying to find one that will baffle you and Ossining. I will continue trying.
Let me commend you on your knowledge of your topic. I would like to invite you to write a guest article for my Biographies topic. Let me know if you would consider it.
Mary
-- posted by Red
» Mugwump53 - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rumors of adultry and bigamy...
In response to message posted by Red:Keep trying to stump us. This is a lot of fun. thanks.
-- posted by Mugwump53
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.