|
|
In A Quest for National IdentityRead the article this discussion is about
This archived discussion is "read only".
» knightcat50 - Privacy? Well...that blew me away. Of course we deserve privacy. Just because it doesn't exist anymore, doesn't mean we have to like it. It's a matter of choice, if you want to give it away, fine. Yes, we are all becoming accustomed to not having privacy, and next we'll get used to not having freedom either. But it really doesn't matter from now on, because our world has changed, and we have to change with it. So it is written, so shall it be...get used to it. There is nothing we can do about it, period. So what the hell are we fighting for?-- posted by knightcat50 » cliff_aliperti - In total agreement... I just discussed this with some co-workers today. With all of the info the government already has on us, it would probably be more efficient to wrap it all up into one card anyway...it's not like they'll be learning anything they don't already know, it'll just all be at hand at once. I've got nothing to hide.-- posted by cliff_aliperti » vemartin - Re: Privacy? In response to message posted by knightcat50:
What will it take before you finally leave the valley of denial and stride onto the plains of acceptance: another building falling to the ground, or perhaps two, or three? How many is the magic number? How many people have to die before we come to understand that we do not live in a vacuum? I love my freedoms as much as the next American believe me I do, but how can I exercise them, if I am living in constant fear of attack from terrorist, or worse dead? If I wanted to live in Israel, I’d emigrate. We need not drift to the far right, or far left of this issue in order to put into place a common sense set of laws that both protect us, and preserve our freedoms. Emotion will not get it done. Intelligent discourse and a trained eye upon the constitution will. Vincent E. Martin -- posted by vemartin » tellmeonce - Re: Re: Privacy? In response to message posted by vemartin:Hi Vincent, Yes, we are lucky to live here, and to have been born here. I don't recall anyone saying you should move to Israel. Afraid? Why sould we be afraid? Isn't that what they want. In fear we are weak. Are we promised a rose garden? Are we better than others who are also living in fear? No. This is a matter for the world to deal with, and we all must face it, and deal with it on a personal level. If you look back on history, it has always been this way. When has a nation, or peoples ever been safe from dying or being overcome by an enemy? Never. This is the face of war, hate, and weapons of destruction. This is the nature of mankind, and his collective consciousness. The enemy is within our hearts, and minds. It is not out "there" somewhere. It is hiding in us all, and we become afraid when it raises it's ugly head. Fear sucks us into itself like an ugly monster. I guess it depends on how you look at life, and death. Please excuse my mistakes...I suffer from meniere's disease, lupus, ptsd, fibromyalgia, coronary artery disease, and ??? who knows what's next that will pop up. I think I have discovered a wll kept secret. If you like to investigate, and research...try this one. http://www.nexusmagazine.com/mycoplasma.... I would be grateful if you could prove, or disprove this article....there are references. It is difficult for me with the meniere's disease, and all. I came accross this info while doing research on my new found diseases. Because of this disability, I have lost everything, and am a whisper from being homeless. I have even lost my future plans, my hopes and dreams. So please excuse my ramblings. But it's how I feel. -- posted by tellmeonce » BuckyRea - Good, but sobering article Vincent, I pretty much agree with your basic observation that our state and federal agencies already have an array of data on all of our private lives, and that increasing the efficiency of the use of that information is, on balance, clearly in the national interest. It's just a little shocking to see it put so directly. I particularly appreciate your "valley of denial" metaphor.But I don't think we should lose sight of the basic reasons behind our caution in making government policing activities more efficient. Along with that efficiency, there will always be the danger of abuse. It is the nature of governmental regulation to trend toward using power to harass the individual. Some individuals, of course, need harassing. Others don't. And it is impossible to tell the difference between who does and doesn't deserve it from simple "profiling." I like your idea of civil libertarians being involved with the sundry police agencies to ensure that increases in policing efficiency--which are obviously needed--do not lead to policing abuses. I seriously doubt that most law enforcement agencies will welcome their involvement. In the past our society has enjoyed a margin of safety from police abuse by the inefficiency of our federal, state, and local bureaucracies. In making our society safer from terrorists, we must sacrifice that margin of safety. This is the core of what Jefferson meant by "eternal vigilence" being the price of freedom. I know we have to cross this street. I only hope we all remember to look both ways for oncoming dangers. -- posted by BuckyRea
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|