|
|
Oil for Food (OFF) Debacle aka UNSCAM
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next » » Lawhawk - Sevan Suspended With Pay By Kofi http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=st...The next bunch of steps by the UN is a whitewash. I would be more encouraged by this suspension had Kofi rescinded the diplomatic immunity for Sevan and others named and unnamed thus far in the UNSCAM investigation. Then we'd see real action. -- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - Judicial Watch Files Suit To Get U.S. Documents http://www.nysun.com/article/9092-- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - Benon Sevan Blocked Audit http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=st...The U.N. oil-for-food program chief under scrutiny for alleged corruption and mismanagement blocked a proposed audit of his office around the same time he's accused of soliciting lucrative oil deals from Iraq (news - web sites), according to investigators. -- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - Is it time to perp walk Sevan and Kojo Annan? http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/a...The Washington Times reports this morning that the Senate investigation into the Oil-For-Food program led by Norm Coleman will highlight much more active roles for Kojo Annan and Benon Sevan in the corruption than Paul Volcker's interim report suggested. Annan played a more significant role with Cotecna than Volcker reported.Of course, asking for their heads, plus that of Kofi Annan may not come to fruition because too many players are at risk of doing the perp walk themselves for their involvement in the scandal. While Benon Sevan and Kojo Annan are low hanging fruit who may be the sacrificial lambs to protect the UN from a more thorough investigation - which means Kofi is more secure. -- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - Lax oversight is just the start... http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/406...A former U.N. oil-for-food inspector told a Senate panel yesterday that he witnessed managers drinking on the job while hundreds of trucks carrying unknown cargo crossed the Iraqi border — unchecked.The UN wasn't committed to properly overseeing the OFF program, and Saddam exploited this knowledge. He worked on those countries that might be favorable to lifting sanctions, and officials who could grease the wheels in his favor. -- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - A case against the UN http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,1477...U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Louise Frechette (search) said the United Nations was unprepared for the mammoth task of providing humanitarian relief for 24 million Iraqis and hoped it would never be given a job like the Oil-for-Food (search) program again.Seems to me, that this is a good enough reason to keep the UN from being involved in tsunami relief as well. Considering that the tsunami relief will affect an even larger population and a wider geographic area, Frechette's comments are revealing. -- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - Roger L. Simon: Little Chance Volcker Will Reveal True Extent http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2...Great as Claudia Rosett has been, the only one who could really write the story of Oil-for-Food is Joseph Conrad because this tale of corruption is as rich and complex as Nostromo or Under Western Eyes. For the last few days, lead investigators for Paul Volcker's Independent Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil-for-Food Progamme have been in London, Geneva, Paris and perhaps elsewhere, interviewing parties of interest who may have known about connections between Kojo Annan, Cotecna, and Nigerian and Iraqi government officials. A final report is promised by the end of the month but I am somewhat skeptical that this particular group can complete their task effectively. They are reportedly American attorneys. Do they have the linguistic capabilities (fluent Arabic and French at the minimum), not to mention experience in the ways of the developing world, to investigate murky transactions that took place in Africa in 1998-1999?I'm with Roger on this although for slightly different reasons. The Volcker crew doesn't have subpoena powers, which means it can't get the people it wants to testify and give evidence to come in and testify. It has to hope that people will talk. That differs from the Senate and House investigations being run in Congress into the matter - those committee investigations have subpoena powers, though limited by diplomatic immunity among some of those involved, but it is far more revealing than Volcker's investigation. -- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - Turning up the heat... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,1490...With U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (search) next up for review by Paul Volcker’s inquiry into the Oil-for-Food scandal, a crucial question is whether Volcker will expand upon information tying the scandal directly to the U.N. chief’s office — by way of Annan’s second-in command, Louise Frechette (search).Release the hounds and let at 'em. -- posted by Lawhawk » Lawhawk - By Boutros-Ghali - Former UN Sec. Gen. Implicated? http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/416... - again, not a real surprise that members of the UN were deeply involved in UNSCAM, but this is the most significant indication that Saddam Hussein thoroughly coopted the UN's oversight regime for OFF.Former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali worked against U.S.-backed sanctions against Saddam Hussein — and even had an Iraqi Ba'athist advising him on Middle East policy, a former U.N. official said. -- posted by Lawhawk « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|