CLOSED Bob_Brinker_Discussion Site 43,700 Use New Thread!


  1. JIMMY62
  2. Jonathon
  3. Will_L
  4. ACousins
  5. La_la
  6. La_la
  7. Will_L
  8. La_la
  9. Will_L
  10. La_la

This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.


« Previous 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 Next »


Top 1346.   Jul 8, 2002 6:14 PM

» JIMMY62 - Re: Re: random walk from bob

In response to message posted by Will_L:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Author: Will_L
Date: July 8, 2002 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: random walk from bob
In response to message posted by JIMMY62:
Yes, Brinker often claims to be a lone voice in the wilderness. He found out with the QQQs that sometimes the rest of the platoon is not out of step.

QQQ was selected becauise of it high beta value. Bob was right. QQQ has lost more than any other index since the call.

Brinker's claim of any ability to find a market that is undervaluing assets while claiming that individual issues cannot be undervalued because of the efficient marke theory is a stumper.
The reported caller did not propose buying undervalued assets. Caller proposed buying good stocks. Bob said the concept brought no advantage. Which it doesn't

The bottom line is that all Brinker has to sell is the BS that he can time the markets.

Bob's primary product is entertainment.

-- posted by JIMMY62



Top 1347.   Jul 8, 2002 6:38 PM

» Jonathon - lest we forget

In response to message posted by JIMMY62:

jimmy, isn't brinker's training in radio? didn't he get an a degree in broadcasting? didn't he spend years doing radio and race track announcing? you hit the nail on the head, he is entertainment. lesson learned.

-- posted by Jonathon



Top 1348.   Jul 8, 2002 6:44 PM

» Will_L - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the market is in a SECULAR BE

In response to message posted by La_la:

"he has NEVER even pretended to be 100% certain. You're not kiddin.' I don't think he's ever said he was 100% certain of anything, unless he was speaking about events that had already passed. So much of the discussion here, is in terms of "he said this would happen," or, "if he thought THAT was going to happen, why not go 100%! The answers to these are obvious, and the anger of others here, clouds their ability to grasp your common sense"

Ok Lala shill,

Here's the skinny. Your guru said there are two possibilities for his next COUNTER TREND EVENT--only his second such counter trend call since he began this charade in 86.

He claims his next call is either the GREATEST BUYING OPPORTUNITY OF ALL TIME or if that fails his fall back position as the only other possiblity is that his next counter trend call will be A VERY EXTRAORDINARY BUYING OPPORTUNITY.

Now if that Bs doesn't qualify as 100% certain of his "next" counter trend call what would lead you to say that he is 100% certain?

Btw his last counter trend event is down over 70% and in his last newsletter he claims the reason those who "have positions in the Nasdaq 100 (QQQs) " ought to listen to him is because they need to know when he calls his next Counter trend event to extricate themselves from the tremendous losses of the last time he was 100% sure that he was right. Show me any qualifications in the ACT IMMEDIATELY bulletin as to risk or failure of his advice.

No your guru knows that being 100% certain sells newsletters. So did the Grubman guy at Soloman--he's the only guy worse than Brinker at picking technology stocks/funds that I know of. Course he got paid more for being crooked and wrong. smile

-- posted by Will_L



Top 1349.   Jul 8, 2002 6:49 PM

» ACousins - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the market is in a SECULAR BE

In response to message posted by La_la:

So much of the discussion here, is in terms of "he said this would happen," or, "if he thought THAT was going to happen, why not go 100%!

The answers to these are obvious, and the anger of others here, clouds their ability to grasp your common sense.

It is your total lack of common sense that prevents you from seeing the truth. People expect accuracy from Bob because HE promotes that image. All the better to divorce people from their hard earned cash.

If he wants people to stop laughing at his mistakes, he should admit his mistakes, apologize for them, take his lumps and move forward. He shouldn't LIE like a banshee about his record.

HE claimed he would sidestep a bear and would even go short the market. HE claims he sees a bear. HOWEVER HE didn't sidestep it but HE acts as if he did.

LIE? SCAM? SCUM OF THE EARTH? I think so.

-- posted by ACousins



Top 1350.   Jul 8, 2002 6:51 PM

» La_la - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the market is in a SECULA

In response to message posted by Will_L:

What an irrelevant, nonsensical response. Are you and Fred the same person?

Your guru said there are two possibilities for his next COUNTER TREND EVENT--

Huh? .."next Counter Trend Event?" You make up phrases and Brinker quotes out of whole cloth.

-- posted by La_la



Top 1351.   Jul 8, 2002 7:01 PM

» La_la - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the market is in a SECULA

In response to message posted by ACousins:

If he wants people to stop laughing at his mistakes, he should admit his mistakes, apologize for them, take his lumps and move forward. He shouldn't LIE like a banshee about his record.

LIE? SCAM? SCUM OF THE EARTH? I think so.

Yes, the laughter of your obviously jovial personality always shines through.

-- posted by La_la



Top 1352.   Jul 8, 2002 7:03 PM

» Will_L - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the market is in a SE

In response to message posted by La_la:

"Your guru said there are two possibilities for his next COUNTER TREND EVENT--

Huh? .."next Counter Trend Event?" You make up phrases and Brinker quotes out of whole cloth. "

Now look shill, I am giving you what YOUR GURU SAID.

If he is not saying we are in a SECULAR BEAR MARKET--please tell me.

If I am correct and I am and that his take is that we are IN A SECULAR BEAR MARKET then by definition if he is calling for a CYCLICAL bull market that would be "A COUNTER TREND EVENT"

"Counter" Lala means "against the grain, the trend--swimming upstream if you will, the "unexpected" because of the overall movement".

Now Lala not only is he saying his next event is going to be a COUNTER TREND EVENT--it is going to be one OF TWO ONLY EVENTS>

IT is either MOABO--The MOTHER OF ALL BUYING OPPORTUNITIES--which would be THE SINGULAR BEST BUYING OPPORTUNITY OF ALL TIME or VEBO--the VERY EXTRAORDINARY BUYING OPPORTUNITY.

If I am not correct please tell me other possibilities he gave in 6 hours this weekend of his next re-entry point.

Did he say I might be wrong? Did he say it might be an average or mediocre buying opportunity?

Nope he gave two choices--the BEST of ALL TIME or the NEXT BEST OF ALL TIME.

Now in Olive Branch if we said that, everybody would understand we were 100% certain something very very good was going to happen.

What did I miss that You know??

-- posted by Will_L



Top 1353.   Jul 8, 2002 7:16 PM

» La_la - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the market is in

In response to message posted by Will_L:

See, it's like this. When you say he said something that he never said, and then have to type a long rambling message to try to explain that what YOU said is what he REALLY believes, I think you're done.

-- posted by La_la



Top 1354.   Jul 8, 2002 7:19 PM

» Will_L - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the market is

In response to message posted by La_la:

No long rambling message there shill--I called your bullchit. You mistook my repost of your bullchit for rambling. Brinker called

A COUNTER TREND EVENT NO Question

He said it would either be the best ever MOTHER OF

OR A VERY EXTRAORDINARY BUYING OPPORTUNITY

What do you misunderstand or what did I misquote??

-- posted by Will_L



Top 1355.   Jul 8, 2002 7:32 PM

» La_la - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brinker claims the marke

In response to message posted by Will_L:

You keep saying.."next counter trend event."

I don't remember him making any correlation between a possible buying opportunity, "mother" or otherwise, and some other "event" you are saying he called, and referring to them both as "counter trend events," or one in the same thing. If YOU want to say they're the same, go right ahead, nobody cares. The problem is when you confuse your mindless rambling with reality.

-- posted by La_la



« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 Next »

Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.