|
|
Moneytalk Bob Brinker Summaries - Information ONLY
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 Next » » Kirk - Detailed summary of the QQQ Advice .Below is a detailed summary of the QQQ controversy. What do you think? Discuss it HERE. Isn't it odd how he kept them out of the model portfolios on the way down and only added QQQs at the bottom? Some have said it is only because he recommends mutual funds for his accounts, but it is clear in his bulletin that you can use a Rydex OTC fund and QQQ interchangeably. Brinker's QQQ Counter trend Rally Advice In Jan 2000 Brinker moved 60% of his equity portfolios to cash. In August 2000 he moved another 5% to cash for a total of 65% in cash reserves. He told subscribers to wait for instructions on how to use these cash reserves. If he had stayed there, this move would have looked brilliant. But, the story is only beginning. October 16, 2000 subscribers got a special bulletin advising them to "Act Immediately" and buy QQQ in anticipation of a 2 to 4 months "counter trend rally" for a 20% or more gain. Callers to the office were told "Bob is comfortable with QQQ at $86." The advice in the bulletin was: November 6, 2000 MT: QQQ=$81.00 December 3, 2000 MT: QQQ=$64.00 Talks about 1990 and how Nasdaq bottomed, then went 9.7% lower before a big rally. Says "In our view, the exceptional oversold [I thought he didn't use TA?] readings registered in the Nasdaq indexes in late-November are a very positive development. … the counter trend rally phase has the potential to carry the Nasdaq indexes as much as 40% to 50% above their late-November closing levels over the next three to six months. This rally has the potential to extend well into the first quarter, and possibly the second quarter of 2001. [snip] Short-term price weakness in the Nasdaq-100... in the 2800's or lower is viewed as an attractive buying opportunity… January's 2001 MT; QQQ=$62.44; "We continue to view short-term price weakness in Nasdaq 100 shares...Clearly, the Nasdaq indexes have moved lower than we anticipated in recent weeks. However, this has not altered our expectation that a major bear market rally will develop going forward....gains for Nasdaq100 index of up to 50% or more measured from Jan 2 low. Recommended within guidelines listed on pages one and two (20 to 50% of cash reserves)." February 2001 MT; QQQ=$61.55; The timeline for the Nasdaq led countertrend rally remains three to six months as measured from the starting point on January 3. March2001 MT; QQQ=$46.70; In our view, the probabilities favor a three to six month bear market rally phase beginning shortly. April 2001 MT; QQQ=$37.40; "We expect the Nasdaq Composite and Nasdaq 100 index to stage a significant recovery over the next several months." May 2001 MT; QQQ=$48.05; "We continue to believe the Nasdaq has the potential to recover in the months ahead." This is the LAST TIME he said the Nasdaq would rally in the months ahead. June 2001 MT; QQQ=$46.05; For subscribers with a position in Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) shares, we recommend holding these shares for future recovery... ... He NOW says to hold until the next cyclical bull market July 2001 MT; QQQ=$46.00; We also recommend subscribers with a position in Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) shares hold for price recovery. August 2001 MT; QQQ=$43; "We also recommend subscribers with a position in Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) shares hold for recovery... September 2001 MT; QQQ=$35.47; XLK-QQQ Swap: "Making this transaction in taxable accounts for tax purposes is consistent with our recommendation to hold QQQ shares for price recovery over time...The switch into XLK...is solely for the purpose of realizing short-term tax losses for current or future use..." October 2001 MT; QQQ=$28.82 "We continue our long-standing policy of not selling into weakness and we recommend subscribers with a position in Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) shares hold these shares as we expect them to trade at much higher levels..." November 2001; QQQ=$35; "long standing policy of not selling into weakness… (QQQ) hold these shares as we expect them to trade at much higher levels during the next cyclical bull market. December 01; QQQ=$40.83; "...we recommend holding in anticipation of higher price levels during the next cyclical bull market..." January 02; QQQ=$41.67; "we prefer to hold existing positions in the expectation that the next cyclical bull..." February 02; QQQ=$36.92; "..hold these shares for recovery during the next cyclical bull..." March 02; QQQ=$35.74; "...can hold these shares in anticipation of much higher prices in the next cyclical bull..." April 02; QQQ=$36.06: "We are also retaining our hold rating..." May '02; QQQ=$31.56: "We are also retaining our hold rating." June '02; QQQ=$30.04: "We are maintaining a hold rating." July 5, '02; QQQ=$26.34: "We continue our policy of not selling into weakness, and recommend those with a position in Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) shares hold for higher prices during the next cyclical bull market." August 8, '02 QQQ=$22.25 : "We are maintaining our hold rating on Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) shares…" September 2, '02; QQQ=$23.49; "We are maintaining our hold rating on Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) shares in anticipation of much higher prices for the shares in the next cyclical bull market. October 5, '02; QQQ=20.75; hold. No commentary. Nov 2002 MT; QQQ=$25.90; hold. We recommend holding existing stock market positions at current levels, along with ... QQQ." Dec 2002 MT; QQQ=$28.00; hold; " Marketimer recommends retaining existing equity market holdings at this time. This includes … QQQ." Jan 2003 MT: QQQ=$25.68; hold. No commentary. Feb 2003 MT: QQQ=$24.49; hold. No commentary. March 2003 MT: QQQ=$24.49; hold. Showing good relative strength vs S&P500 so far this year. March 11, 2003 Bulletin; QQQ=$24.06; BUY QQQ or ROYCX. Advises subscribers to become fully invested. Makes no mention of previous QQQ buys. Recommended increasing weighting of QQQ in P1 to 25%, P2 to xx% & P3 to yy%. Active/Passive portfolio doesn't get any QQQ??? NOW he puts QQQs into the model portfolios. Simply amazing that he gets away with advertising his performance without the QQQs included on the way down from $83 to $24. Summary: Between 1/1/00 and April 20, 2003, Brinker's model portfolio #1 with QQQ applied lost 30.4% while the S&P500 lost 42.8% (not counting dividends). With dividends applied, I think Brinker's P1 beat the S&P500 by about 10% which is a good result but not what he advertises. Click for a September 23, 2005 update of Bob Brinker and QQQQ History I think my newsletter offers better value for those looking to get to critical mass. Of course, I am highly biased! I recommend those who follow Brinker use his active passive, low cost portfolio or my even simpler Total Stock Market & Total Bond Portfolio I give for free here, then replace the percentage Brinker recommends for P1, P2 and P3 into QQQQ with my newsletter portfolio. For 2005, "Kirk's Newsletter Portfolio" was Up 13.2% vs. QQQQ up 1.2% vs. DJIA down 0.6% vs. S&P500 Up 4.8% As of 12/31/05 the Total Return for "Kirk's Newsletter Portfolio" since 12/31/98 is Up 197% while the S&P500 only up 12%!!! & NASDAQ only up 1%!!! (my portfolio beta is roughly equal to that of QQQQ.) What should be quite clear is a “buy and forget” market strategy using the DOW, S&P500 or NASDAQ would have under performed holding money funds over the past seven years while my newsletter portfolio nearly tripled every dollar invested.
-- posted by Kirk « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|