Moneytalk Bob Brinker Summaries - Information ONLY


  1. Jonathon
  2. David_Korn
  3. David_Korn
  4. Kirk
  5. Erik75
  6. reporter20
  7. Will_L
  8. JackSwanson
  9. DellaO
  10. High66

This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.


« Previous 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Next »


Top 616.   Nov 6, 2002 12:05 PM

» Jonathon - brinker's prediction on rates

In response to message posted by David_Korn:

david didn't brinker go out on a limb and predict that we would only get a 25 basis point cut in interest rates?

-- posted by Jonathon



Top 617.   Nov 7, 2002 7:07 PM

» David_Korn - Re: brinker's prediction on rates

In response to message posted by Jonathon:

That is correct Jonathon.

-- posted by David_Korn



Top 618.   Nov 7, 2002 7:08 PM

» David_Korn - Bob Brinker on CNBC


Bob Brinker will host a special edition of Moneytalk on CNBC on Thursday, November 28. Broadcast times are 9pm and midnight eastern, and 6pm and 9pm pacific.

- David Korn, editor of http://www.begininvesting.com/

-- posted by David_Korn



Top 619.   Nov 27, 2002 7:24 PM

» Kirk - Update for the Kirk Bashers

.
I have gotten word that the "Kirk Bashers" on "another site" were all upset that I didn't update my performance numbers more often.

Well, I updated them today.

Performance since inception on 9/30/98:
Kirk's Newsletter Stock Portfolio +169.5% !!! (as of 11/27/02)
S&P500 (via SPY) = -2.2% ( More than a double and a half vs a loss! No contest!)

I even added YTD numbers in the table
http://www.suite101.com/files/topics/270...
but I don't promise to update those often because it is a pain and few buy newsletters when the market is going down even though my very best stock picking was just weeks ago when I caught a "V-bottom" between 10/10/02 and 10/15/02

Here is a sample of some of my "best work" in LRCX for 2001 and 2002.

Bought 300 Shares @ $15.875 on 10/17/00 (-$ 4,778)
Note the date... QQQ was $83 then... and LRCX closed today at $17.17!!!!
Sold 300 shares @ $26.000 on 01/30/01 (+$ 7,800)
Booking a very nice gain I might say...
More LRCX buys n sells:

Sold 200 shares @ $24.250 on 03/21/01 (+$ 4,835)
Sold 200 shares @ $30.250 on 05/15/01 (+$ 6,035)
Sold 100 shares @ $26.000 on 01/03/02 (+$ 2,585)
Bought 150 Shares @ $20.000 on 06/11/02 (-$ 3,015)
Bought 200 Shares @ $15.000 on 07/23/02 (-$ 3,015)
Bought 300 Shares @ $10.760 on 09/10/02 (-$ 3,242)
Bought 300 Shares @ $ 8.920 on 10/15/02 (-$ 2,691)
Sold 200 shares @ $13.090 on 11/01/02 (+$ 2,603)
Sold 300 shares @ $15.000 on 11/21/02 (+$ 4,485)

You can see why the Brinker appologists hate me as they have a guy who many think promised to attempt to trade counter trend rallies using QQQ, failed and gave up leaving them down huge.

Some of us know enough that not all buys and sells are winners so make MANY buys and sells of small amounts (this is called D-I-V-E-R-S-I-T-Y).

Few professionals are foolish to advise throwing a third of anyone's life savings into a single trade..... but one guy did, Will and I warned about it right here, and they hate us with a passion for being right.

Many will remember that I advised against trying to time the market at the time Brinker went to 60:40 in Jan 2000. I said he might be 100% right on that call but most timers eventually mess up trying to get back in and lose all advantage even before you consider taxes. Brinker's QQQ investors only had to wait until the week of 10/16/00 to find out just how right my warning was.

Oh well... call it tuition.

Brinker was right about ONE THING…
<img src=http://cbs.marketwatch.com/charts/int-ad... width=452 height=366>
There were some very nice counter trend rallies to be played and some of us made good coin.

I do get a kick out of all the "anti-fan" posts some make about me elsewhere. I'm darned proud of my results and they are ALL on the books. smile smile

yeah, I'm down 11% YTD, but that happens when you are in a bear market. I'd be about even YTD if not for my two telecom blowups in WCOM and CACS.. The goal should be to keep some of what you make in the bull markets so your total portfolio grows over time. If you are really good (or lucky) then your portfolio grows faster than the S&P500 which mine seems to be doing.

Last point. I trade LRCX mostly because it is a GOOD STOCK that I like for the long term. If wrong, I just hold for a cycle. Notice that it is higher today than it was on 10/17/00 when so many bought QQQ instead.

-- posted by Kirk



Top 620.   Nov 28, 2002 11:24 PM

» Erik75 - Re: Bob Brinker on CNBC

In response to message posted by David_Korn:

What did the big turkey say on his CNBC Thanksgiving show? Did he address how he has completely missed the recent large market runup?

-- posted by Erik75



Top 621.   Nov 29, 2002 8:06 AM

» reporter20 - Re: Re: Bob Brinker on CNBC

In response to message posted by Erik75:

Hey Erik

There was a real estate question, LOTS of Ginnie Mae talk, a little Total Bond Fund talk as compared to Ginnie Mae, more Ginnie Mae talk, and a caller who asked the difference between the Wilshire 5000 and the Russell 3000, to which Bob replied 2000 stocks. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

-- posted by reporter20



Top 622.   Nov 29, 2002 8:16 AM

» Will_L - Re: Re: Re: Bob Brinker on CNBC

In response to message posted by reporter20:

The only thing I would add to Reporter's remarks is that Brinker also talked about Ginnie Mae's. smile................a lot.

-- posted by Will_L



Top 623.   Nov 29, 2002 9:18 AM

» JackSwanson - Stinker's CNBC appearance

It was pretty pathetic. Talk of Ginnie Maes and total market index. No talk, of course, of market direction. He'll never mention that again. He will NEVER talk about market direction again, and you will NEVER, freaking NEVER, hear him ever mention his timing model again. You take that to the bank this day, he will never breathe a word about that bogus failure of a timing model. He'll talk about the market in very general terms, making his show no different than anybody elses. Stinker, he has proven to me to be a full blown loser. A pathetic dweeb of a man with no conviction. He gives a crap about his two bit newsletter only and having it survive. He'd say anything to keep it afloat. This man falls into the bottom rung of society, a leach, a huckster, a conman. I can't stand him and his ilk. Nobody can come with an argument against my statement that he is a pathetic human being.

-- posted by JackSwanson



Top 624.   Nov 29, 2002 10:00 AM

» DellaO - Re: Stinker's CNBC appearance

In response to message posted by JackSwanson:

Jack,

I didn't see this Brinker fiasco, but a friend told me that at least his desk was neat and tidy. smile

-- posted by DellaO



Top 625.   Nov 29, 2002 11:19 AM

» High66 - Re: Re: Re: Bob Brinker on CNBC

In response to message posted by reporter20:
Most interesting about Brinker on CNBC was his reference to his Website and the "Summaries". WOW - those were removed 2 months ago. Was this a repeat of the last CNBC special?

-- posted by High66



« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Next »

Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.