Moneytalk Bob Brinker Summaries - Information ONLY


  1. joe_fabitz
  2. High_IQ
  3. Jonathon
  4. Fred2000
  5. High_IQ
  6. Slick
  7. Rande
  8. Will_L
  9. High_IQ
  10. Rande

This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.


« Previous 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Next »


Top 556.   Oct 15, 2000 5:13 PM

» joe_fabitz - High_IQ is just a chain-yanker...

I know what David said in his 9/21 alert too and thus can validate that "High_IQ" is full of it with his accusation.
The poster most likely never purchased these calls anyway and is just trying to get things going here. Might be 'justastiff' himself since he never misses an opportunity to jam up David.

Wassa matter, bubba, bored today?

-- posted by joe_fabitz



Top 557.   Oct 16, 2000 3:53 AM

» High_IQ - Let the People Decide.

Kirk: Yep, you proved my point. This is a censored site. Oh, it is very subtle. You are told you are off topic and then your posts are moved to a morass of topics or to a derogatory thread to try to make you look like an idiot. Yes, you have tons of topics so you can lose a post quite easily. What a joke. This whole site is a joke.

Let's look at you. You first tell me that no discussion of a paid subscription service is allowed "here." Clearly, you meant at the Suite but once you realize that this would prohibit discussion on MarketTimer you change your story. You then say that I am off topic. Trouble is, there are many off topic posters here already like yourself who is posting off topic as well. When confronted with this fact, you blow your cool and explode to call me a liar and that you have had a copy of the terrible Korn advice all morning long.

Well, Kirk, looks as though there is another problem with your approach. Seems as if you had a copy of the awful advice to buy calls all morning long why not just tell me I am a liar to begin with? Why all the pretense? Why say discussion of a paid service is not allowed? Why say that I am off topic? Why did you call me a liar to begin with not just print the negligent release in its entirety and let the people decide themselves?

Well, the reason is you know I have a point and will make it as soon as you have the guts to post the Special Advisory. But nobody here is willing to do it. Nobody here has the guts. All they have to do to show that I don't have a point is to post the advisory and let people decide for themselves.

But not here at the censored site. They are on the defense now and have resorted to ridicule by removing my posts to some juvenille thread because they can't take the heat. They can all dish it out just fine but they can't take any criticism at all.

No, Korn and Kirk won't post the special advisory because they know I have a point and they don't want their mistakes shown to the public. They are partners and conflicts of interest are all over the place here. I love it. They subject Brinker to ridicule at this site day in and day out. They dress him up like a clown and sing slly songs and poems about them. But when they make one mistake, it is like Watergate and they scurry to cover it up. And, of course, if I were to post it they would kick me off or claim that it never happened or say that my advisory is doctored or move it to some derogatory thread.

Let's see if they have the guts to let people decide for themselves. They won't because their actions show without question that they are covering up the entire incident. What are they hiding? They will move this post because they don't want Korn subject to any criticism so they can assist in selling his service. Yep, we all know the deal is here.

-- posted by High_IQ



Top 558.   Oct 16, 2000 6:39 AM

» Jonathon - David K!

Joe you are right. Justa is lonely with no forum to post at right now so he needs to take his David K bashing over here. Welcome High IQ, I am sure Kirk enjoys the page hits as you support Suite101. Pretty funny. I am sure High IQ isn't even a subscriber to David K's Interpretations and just wants to stir things up. David, if you are out there, I love your Interpretations. Keep at em boy!

-- posted by Jonathon



Top 559.   Oct 16, 2000 1:49 PM

» Fred2000 - Jonathon

Your post sounds just as preposterous as some of the posts on the Brinker site. Keep it up and we can call this BB2.COM

-- posted by Fred2000



Top 560.   Oct 16, 2000 4:18 PM

» High_IQ - No Special Advisory

Yep, just checking in to see if anyone at this site have chosen post the Special Advisory. Nope, there seems to be no takers.

Yes, Korn liked NVLS calls when the stock was trading in the upper 50s. Calls expire this week. After hours and after earnings tonight NVLS is trading in the low $30s. Kiss that one goodbye!!

Just think of all the hits this site would genertate if just Korn or Kirk would post the Special Advisory. The hits would roll in and Korn could solicit more subscribers if Korn was not so ashamed of this advice. Seems very odd that they would not take this opportunity to drum up more business if it were something worth bragging about in the Advisory. It could mean more loose change for Korn.

So we must conclude that they have something to hide. Maybe it is alias references in the Special Advisory. You know, where Korn thinks he identifies Brinker through an alias at bobbrinker.com and bases his NVLS and MSFT call purchases on what the alias said.

If people were not hurt by this advice, it would surely be quite funny to say the least. I mean, who would buy call postions based on what an alias said on the internet? Imagine, people paying for internet service that makes speculative trades based on an alias posting on the internet.

Yep, Korn can dish it out but just can't take it. He likes to maintain a flawless image and loves to judge other like Brinker but does not want to subject himself to the same scrutiny.

-- posted by High_IQ



Top 561.   Oct 16, 2000 5:33 PM

» Slick - korn Investment Advice ?

Well, IQ...I said it in chat to you , and I'll say it in a post: Anyone who would follow any investment ideas from DK, deserves what he gets. And I mean no disrespect of David. His interpretations are poignant, at times ...insightful , at times...and amusing ...always. But puts and calls...Huh? Not in my lifetime ( he's a lawyer...and a young one to boot!) so if you got burned---take it as a lesson and go on with life.Droping 600 clams on an option "ain't" the world. (:>)

Slick

-- posted by Slick



Top 562.   Oct 16, 2000 7:51 PM

» Rande - Tell you one thing, though, David K.

Tell you one thing, though, David K. could give IQ a sorely needed personality transplant and still have plenty to spare. Seems like a nice and genuine guy. Some others, well, they just leave you saying, "yuck" while you wait for your skin to stop crawling.

-- posted by Rande



Top 563.   Oct 16, 2000 9:29 PM

» Will_L - An Observation

Would appear that in closing down-Brinker took Justa's key away from him so he's hanging around over here using as a screen name something he's always coveted but never demonstrated over in Brinkerland.

-- posted by Will_L



Top 564.   Oct 17, 2000 1:55 PM

» High_IQ - Can't Deal with the Facts

Yep, they can call me disparage me all day long which is typical of this happy site, but what else can they do? What else can they say when I am right. Yep, when you can't dispute the facts, you go after the person. Too bad it is so obvious to anyone reading this thread that it should prove embarrassing to those who penned the nonsense. But this site knows no shame.

-- posted by High_IQ



Top 565.   Oct 17, 2000 2:05 PM

» Rande - IQ -- Are you Bob? Just curious.

IQ -- Are you Bob? Just curious. You sure act like him.

-- posted by Rande



« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Next »

Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.