Moneytalk Bob Brinker Summaries - Information ONLY

Top 537. Oct 15, 2000 9:20 AM

» Rande - IQ,

IQ,

One thing's for sure -- here you don't have to worry about David Korn logging in under an "alias" in order to launch a character assassination campaign against you, no matter how obnoxious you might be.

-- posted by Rande

Top 538. Oct 15, 2000 9:24 AM

» JenL_2 - Hi_IQ....

....This is not a censored site, but we do try to keep the threads on topic a little. This is the MoneyTalk Summaries thread. What you're talking about has nothing to do with MoneyTalk. We do have a Covered Calls thread if you'd like to discuss options trading. Most of us have no idea what you're talking about, regardless of whether or not we subscribe to David's interpretations.....Jen

-- posted by JenL_2

Top 539. Oct 15, 2000 9:28 AM

» Sajis - Jen

Thank you Jen. I just e-mailed David and received a response already. The internet makes communication so much faster than mail it is amazing. I bought this computer just a couple months ago and it has already paid for itself in terms of my education.

-- posted by Sajis

Top 540. Oct 15, 2000 9:29 AM

» Sajis - Kirk

Jen who is Kirk Lindstrom?

-- posted by Sajis

Top 541. Oct 15, 2000 9:39 AM

» Rande - Oh, brother.

Oh, brother.

-- posted by Rande

Top 542. Oct 15, 2000 10:12 AM

» Kirk - High_IQ

Don't play games with us.

Jen is right. This is a thread for posting summaries of the show Moneytalk.

David Korn has his own service just like Murphy and many others. IF you want to start a thread to discuss this, then that is fine. I was probalby wrong to say we didn't want it discussed here. I MEANT I didn't want it discussed in the Brinker Summary thread. That would seem fair. I was not aware that he gave advice, but suggesting a follow up on what he advises makes sense. This is not a site to promote or bash David Korn and this thread in particular is not the place. IF David cares to post a free sample here, we allow it as it is on topic.

BTW, this is not a court of law so perhaps we might not be perfect in our choice of words. You seem like a novice on the internet so I suggest you cut people a bit of slack when you use the internet and you will find the experience much more enjoyable.

-- posted by Kirk

Top 543. Oct 15, 2000 10:31 AM

» Kirk - Sajis

Welcome to our site!

How did you find us?

To learn more about me, just click on my name in one of my posts. Many members also fill out their "Member Profiles" by clicking on "My Stuff" in the green bar at the top of most pages then clicking on "Member Profile" where you can add some information about yourself. This helps build the community spirit. Some, like Slick, put a link to pictures of their kids in their signature. You can upload pictures and more to free homepages here at Suite101.com.

Send an email to jen or myself and we'll send you a site guide on how to better navigate this site. mailto:KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com?subje...

BTW, BIG upgrade planned for tonight....

-- posted by Kirk

Top 544. Oct 15, 2000 1:30 PM

» High_IQ - Not a Covered Call

Jen: No, this was not a covered call so your suggestion to put the post there under the "covered call thread" would be inappropriate and would cause further problems I am sure. DK recommended to buy calls outright and it was a bad idea. Thanks anyway!!

-- posted by High_IQ

Top 545. Oct 15, 2000 2:06 PM

» High_IQ - Words do Matter

Kirk: Yes, it was not clear what you meant by "here." It could have meant "here" on the thread or "here" at the "Suite." But if you really did not mean the Suite it seems you would have said so in your original post that I was off topic. But you never said I was off topic in your post. Not even close.

Maybe I should start up an Introduction to "Good Writing and Critical Thought Thread" for further discussion of this topic. But one of the big problems with this site is that there are too many topics. It seems counterproductive to ask everyone go through the thread list to find a place for a post when one is responding to a particular post and that response may contain a bit of off topic information in your view. Big deal.

Anyway, it seems that given the broad title of the thread here -- "Bob Brinker Summaries" -- that my post was on topic. DK posted his summary and invited people to get on his mailing list and I commented on a part of his summary service that was part of that mailing list solicitiation. That post prompted my comment. Why would I post my comment to this post on a unrelated thread when it was directed at that post in particular? It interrupts the free flow of thought and is silly. I don't know what the big deal is all about with my silly little post. Geez, if I did not know any better, it would seem that you guys were trying to cover up for this advice to buy calls.

-- posted by High_IQ