|
|
Moneytalk Bob Brinker Summaries - Information ONLY
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next » » LR - On 2/29 BB mentioned something about "massive distribution" (I t On 2/29 BB mentioned something about "massive distribution" (I think that's what the term was) from last Aug to Oct. I'm not sure what he meant, but it was a danger signal.I wasn't able to hear the whole call.Can anyone clarify? Thanks.-- posted by LR » TONYBRIG - Randes Random Walk Theory It sounds logical but then I havent seen anyproof. Nor have I ever heard anyone else mention it. On CNBC a mention of a specific is always "blamed" for the markets rise/fall. Even if it is just buy or sell orders kicking in at a certain level. If you can prove your theory I will nominate it as a possible dance. "THE RANDOM RANDE WALK" Keep up your great defense of BB. Best of Luck! TonyfromBklyn -- posted by TONYBRIG » RandeS - Far better men than I have demonstrated the validity of the effi Far better men than I have demonstrated the validity of the efficient market hypothesis. Try "Random Walk Down Wall Street," by Malkiel and then check out "Capital Ideas," by Berstein to get the background on the men and ideas that led even some of the most die-hard Wall Street brokers of all time admit that what they do is, "1,500% bullshit." (quote from "Capital Ideas")-- posted by RandeS » TONYBRIG - "Day Traders Look for Work" BB has said more then once that:Something like this: Virtually every DAY TRADER will be going back to their jobs. He mentioned Barons 3/1 article. The story goes that the school charges $5,000 for a 4 week course or somesuchthing like that. That 2/3 disappear. Perhaps this isnt the rite school. The proprietor makes 5m off each (SUCKER) no matter what. What does he care if losers walk. Either the wrong school or the wrong people, or both. (I say) If 1/3 make it then that shows it can be done. I hope that BB gets his act together in this area. CNBC has a week long program on DAY TRADERS. Not all is bad no matter the slant the BEARS in this area put on it. BB will have to EAT HIS WORDS in this area sooner or later when he sees that people dont need to go back to their day jobs. Rande.......... Your rebuttal please! BestofLuck -- posted by TONYBRIG » TONYBRIG - 1/3 Traded others they Faded Yes Bob/Rande/All/I read the article in Barons; funny I got a different version then you reported on Sundays -- posted by TONYBRIG » DanG_6 - The Daytrading "Profession" Tony, love your style. Actually I'm certain that there will always be folks who can succeed in very difficult professions. In fairness to BB, I think what he is saying is that 99 out of 100 people (or maybe even more!) can succeed by investing in something as simple as an index fund for the long term. But maybe only 1 in a hundred can succeed at daytrading, which requires far more skill, attention, time, guts, you name it. Sort of like trying to make it in the NBA. For every 1000 that try it, maybe 1 or 2 succeed. Of course the rewards for the successful can be great but you have to decide if you really want to buck those odds. Kind of like going for that 100 to 1 long shot at the track. At least that's how I see it.- Dan -- posted by DanG_6 » TONYBRIG - Not easy trading or investing Its not easy just being an investorspecially on days like this. But still there is a technology to it and it can be learned and exercised by cool heads. Lets put it this way If one can win on paper and transfer it to the real world then it can be done. What happens when someone has to win? Thanks Dan and Thruhiker Rande you lost. How come John Bernstein doesnt post here. I'm going to suggest that all new members pay a fee for this valuable site. So It's still TonyfromBklyn BestofLuck -- posted by TONYBRIG « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|