THREAD FULL!!! Bob_Brinker_Discussion_41,600 is CLOSED!!!!!

Top 1473. May 31, 2002 8:19 PM

» SRP_TEX - Re: Is it just me?

In response to message posted by Felipe:

Heckle and Jeckle for me. Annoying magpies. smile

-- posted by SRP_TEX

Top 1474. May 31, 2002 8:20 PM

» Kirk - Re: Is it just me?

In response to message posted by Felipe:

naw... Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb is who I am reminded of. smile

BTW, does anyone click these things below any more? smile

-- posted by Kirk

Top 1475. May 31, 2002 9:22 PM

» ACousins - Dija the Liar hits, runs and hides again!

In response to message posted by dija:

Dija: Obviously...my original point was that Brinker was going against the tide when he went bearish in Jan. 2000. The prevailing sentiment was bullish. They KNOW that is true. Brinker was one of the FEW who saw the bear market coming. They DO NOT WANT TO ADMIT THAT. That is why they are waging this WAR OF SEMANTICS with you and I.

AC: Huh? If EVERYONE was bullish who the heck was selling? I keep asking you this question and you never answer it. Wonder why?

Walkerman, brought up semantics as he refuses to answer Will's question.

Dija: They know that everyone makes some bad calls. In their zeal to destroy him, they have to insist that none of his calls were any good whatsoever. Pathetic.

AC: In your zeal to bring in new customers for Bob and bolster his image with no regard for the truth, it is you who are pathetic and more than a little crooked.

-- posted by ACousins

Top 1476. May 31, 2002 9:24 PM

» dija - Re: Dija is a liar

In response to message posted by Kirk:

dija said: I do not understand why they can't just say "Brinker made a good call in Jan. 2000." But they can't. They cannot admit Brinker has ever made a good call.

Kirk responded: Why do you feel a need to lie?

Kirk, I didn't lie! Here are the facts:

--Brinker made a good call in Jan. 2000. Can brinkerbashers just admit that and move on? NO! They have to say things like:

--Brinker was right for the wrong reason.

--Brinker wasn't the only one. There were many others.

Neither of the above statements are true. The brinkerbashers are attacking the truth tellers with spinning, twisting the truth, and semantics.

I mean, PLEASE!! AC is trying to say that my saying BB was "a voice in the wilderness" means he was THE ONLY ONE! Everyone knows I didn't mean he was the only one. And yet all the brinker bashers jump in to say: "Yah. Right on, AC!"

Who are the liars?

You would think that there was ONE brinker basher out there who would be objective and say: "C'mon AC, Kirk, all you guys. We're in the right here, aren't we? We don't need to spin and twist words to prove our point. When we do that it weakens our case."

Or, maybe your case isn't all that strong to begin with. That would explain it.

-- posted by dija

Top 1477. May 31, 2002 9:29 PM

» dija - Re: Re: Dija and SpicyRangerWalkerman

In response to message posted by DellaO:

DellaO said: "dija, Will you pulleeze quit 'kissing walkerman's hide?" smile

Della, don't you know how to make a - smile ?

I wasn't kissing anyone's hide. I simply agreed with Walkerman, and then EXPLAINED WHY I AGREED WITH HIM.

You, on the other hand, simply praise brinker bashers' posts to the sky even when they are full of holes, and don't say anything to support those posts.

The bottom line: I agreed with a person in a debate, and supported his points.

You simply agreed with someone for no reason other than his prejudices are the same as yours.

-- posted by dija

Top 1478. May 31, 2002 9:34 PM

» dija - Re: Dija the Liar hits, runs and hides again!

In response to message posted by ACousins:

AC said: "In your zeal to bring in new customers for Bob and bolster his image with no regard for the truth, it is you who are pathetic and more than a little crooked."

Whoa! These brinker bashers really get down and dirty when they know they are losing the debate!

-- posted by dija

Top 1479. Jun 1, 2002 3:03 AM

» Fred2000 - Re: newinvestor lacking key deta

In response to message posted by dija:

"I do not understand why they can't just say "Brinker made a good call in Jan. 2000." But they can't! They cannot admit that he has ever made a good call."

dija... Your arguments are based on semantics and have nothing to do with facts. What matters is not how many good calls or bad calls Bob made but rather if his conduct is such that one can rely on him to act in a professional and reliable manner.

Through his actions, he has not earned the trust of his listeners and subscribers. Believing Bob conducts himself well is akin to thinking OJ is innocent.

-- posted by Fred2000

Top 1480. Jun 1, 2002 3:07 AM

» Fred2000 - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: newinvestor lacking key

In response to message posted by dija:

"In their zeal to destroy him, they have to insist that none of his calls were any good whatsoever."

dija... Bob is destroying himself as he destroyed his discussion boards and the trust of his subscribers and listeners.

-- posted by Fred2000

Top 1481. Jun 1, 2002 4:53 AM

» JIMMY62 - Re: Re: Precision

In response to message posted by ACousins:

Dija has repeatedly (and without any factual basis as usual) said that the CTR and the longterm model are completely unrelated.

Completely unrelated is too strong.

The CTR was based on the auxiliary timing model.

In the mythology of Bob's timing models the long term model, currently predicting the S&P 500, indicates when a fully invested stock market position is warranted. The auxiliary timing model is indicates CTRs.

Use of the auxiliary timing model resulted in Bob writing, "We were wrong in our earlier expectation that a countertrend rally would develop.."

I have not heard about the auxiliary timing model since.

-- posted by JIMMY62