FULL! U.S. Stock Market - Discussion 2,000+ Use New Forum!


  1. Kirk
  2. Rande
  3. Rande
  4. mdorsey
  5. stocksystm
  6. mdorsey
  7. Karin_
  8. rasputin
  9. Rande
  10. mdorsey

This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.


« Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next »


Top 191.   Dec 31, 2001 12:40 PM

» Kirk - DOW best and Worst

Interesting.

I own two of the best and one of the worst
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011231...

Monday December 31 2:38 PM ET
Best, Worst Dow Performers in 2001

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq:MSFT - news) shares climbed more than 50 percent in 2001, making it the best-performing stock among the 30 blue-chip companies in the Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI - news)

Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA - news), with a drop of about 40 percent, was the worst Dow performer of the year.

The following is a list of the Dow's four best- and worst- performing issues of 2001 before the conclusion of the final trading day of the year:

Company Percent Change

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT.O) +54

International Business Machines Corp (NYSE:IBM - news) +43

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ - news) +13

Home Depot Inc.(NYSE:HD - news) +12

American Express Co (NYSE:AXP - news) -34

Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HWP - news) -35

Merck & Co Inc.(NYSE:MRK - news) -37

Boeing Co. (BA.N) -40

SOURCE: INSTINET RESEARCH & ANALYTICS

-- posted by Kirk



Top 192.   Dec 31, 2001 5:24 PM

» Rande - The Latest -- Year End

The last couple of years have been tough, though not the worst we've ever seen (unless you were primarily invested in the Nasdaq). Actually, not too bad if you were well-diversified with mid and small-caps and bonds. In any event, here's a toast to "better days ahead." HAPPY NEW YEAR!

2000 and 2001 for the major indexes below with 73-74 by way of comparison.

2000

R2000 -3.03%
DJIA -6.18%
S&P -9.10
VTSMX -10.93%
Nas -39.29%

2001

R2000 +1.03%
DJIA -7.10%
VTSMX 10.96%*
S&P -11.78%*
Nas -21.05%

*estimate w/dividends -- will true-up later

1973
S&P -14.66
R2000 -30.90

1974
S&P -26.47
R2000 -19.95


Also, for historical reference, from the "Ask" thread:

The last time large-cap stocks declined three years in a row (actually, four):

1929 -8.42%
1930 -24.90%
1931 -43.34%
1932 -8.19%

They had a nice rebound though:

1933
Large-caps +53.99%
Small-caps +142.87%

1934
Large-caps -1.44%
Small-caps +24.22%

1935
Large-caps +47.67%
Small-caps +40.19%

1936
Large-caps +33.92%
Small-caps +64.80%

-- posted by Rande



Top 193.   Jan 1, 2002 7:20 AM

» Rande - Re: The Latest -- Year End

In response to message posted by Rande:

updated...


2000

R2000 -3.03%
DJIA -6.18%
VFINX (S&P 500) -9.06%
VTSMX (W5000) -10.57%
Nas -39.29%

2001

R2000 +1.03%
DJIA -7.10%
VTSMX (W5000) -10.97%
VFINX (S&P 500) -12.02%
Nas -21.05%

12/31/99-12/31/01
50/50 Total Stock/Total Bond +0.26%

1973
S&P -14.66
R2000 -30.90

1974
S&P -26.47
R2000 -19.95

-- posted by Rande



Top 194.   Jan 1, 2002 9:23 AM

» mdorsey - It makes since to me.

WEISS COMMENTS


Expect More Downside In 2002
-- December 31, 2001

Stocks opened lower on this last day of 2001. The year is shaping up to be the worst year for the broad market since 1974. And we expect more of the same in 2002. In fact, we forecast that the Dow, the S&P, and the Nasdaq could plummet by as much as 60%.

Why? Just take a look at the underlying fundamentals: Consumers are drowning in an ocean of debt. Corporate credit quality suffered its biggest decline in 10 years, and is expected to decline in 2002 as well. Corporate profits are sinking. The US stock market is more overvalued than ever before.

Unemployment just suffered its worse spike in 19 years, and the layoff announcements continue to stream in. Unemployment is the classic link that will turn an economic slowdown into a vicious circle of falling prices, sliding profits, and more debt problems.

Many of the "experts" are predicting a recovery in 2002. But as the bad economic news continues to hit Wall Street in the new year, expect the sell off to begin.

http://206.96.168.111/home/daily.asp

-- posted by mdorsey



Top 195.   Jan 1, 2002 9:58 AM

» stocksystm - Martin Weiss' Predictive Abilities

Whatever Martin Weiss says cannot be taken at all seriously. His past record is absolutely dismal. He's been forecasting financial devastation and ruin for many, many years.

-- posted by stocksystm



Top 196.   Jan 1, 2002 10:30 AM

» mdorsey - Re: Martin Weiss' Predictive Abilities

In response to message posted by stocksystm:

Even a blind pig finds an acorn every now and then. smile

-- posted by mdorsey



Top 197.   Jan 1, 2002 10:46 AM

» Karin_ - Market Trends

Market Trends

The tables below indicate which industry sectors, market capitalizations, and investment styles are generally in favor or out of favor in the current market environment. They are based on a quantitative analysis of recent stock performance.

http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/srs...

-- posted by Karin_



Top 198.   Jan 1, 2002 4:04 PM

» rasputin - Re: Re: The Latest -- Year End

In response to message posted by Rande:

Thanks for the numbers, Rande. The 50/50 Bond/Stock returns gives an interesting perspective. I think it's time for me to start dca'ing back in, maybe taking advantage of any dips to get fully invested (which at this point I think will be limited to 50% stocks).

No word regarding this from Brinker, huh? I know he backed away from the notion of MOABO, but ain't he gonna' call some kind of a buying opportunity? Would that be SKOABO?

-- posted by rasputin



Top 199.   Jan 1, 2002 8:37 PM

» Rande - Re: The Latest -- Year End

In response to message posted by Rande:

Correction to the "3 in a row" data. Actually, there were three consecutive down years for large caps during WWII:

1939 -5.45%
1940 -15.29%
1941 -17.86%

During that same period, small-caps had positive returns:

1939 +4.69%
1940 +5.36%
1941 +6.71%

For large-caps, those the three down years from 1939-41 were followed by four consecutive up years of 12.43%, 19.45%, 13.80% and 30.72%.

-- posted by Rande



Top 200.   Jan 2, 2002 8:09 AM

» mdorsey - Increase in corporate debt

Increase in corporate debt
could hurt U.S. recovery

Analysts sound alarm as borrowing climbs

By Gregory Zuckerman
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Dec. 31 — Heavy debts are hounding companies in almost every industry, from telecommunications to textiles. Could that be enough to keep the stock-market recovery at bay?

BECAUSE U.S. CORPORATIONS are continuing to add to their debt, instead of cutting back, analysts have begun to sound the alarm. U.S. nonfinancial, nonfarm companies had racked up a record $4.9 trillion of debt as of the end of the third quarter, according to recently released figures from the Federal Reserve.
That was up 6.6% from the third quarter of 2000, even as the economy entered a recession, the stock market swooned and many companies saw their credit ratings slashed.
The fear among analysts is that the debt deluge will put a cap on corporate spending, cutting off what many economists see as a spark for an earnings turnaround next year. That could quickly put a damper on stocks, if earnings improvements that have now been predicted for months begin to look much further off.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/680026.asp

-- posted by mdorsey



« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 Next »

Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.