Market Indicators - Investor Sentiment

» Normxxx - In Memoriam

Those who remain ignorant of History or choose to ignore It, shall be doomed to repeat It.

T E E N A G E    I N V E S T I N G
  full text

By Best Minds, Inc. | 22 August 2005

I am very fortunate to have two great teenage sons. Sure, there are times when we have a good argument or two, but overall they’re really great guys. One aspect of their growing up that is somewhat comical, is their attitude toward money. I hear things like, “Dad, I know I lost the ______, but can’t we just get another one?” or, “What do you mean that I need to pay for my gas?” I must admit my relief when I occasionally hear, “You wouldn’t believe how much I had to pay for _____.”

If your children are old enough for you to have journeyed through those years, then I am sure you have plenty of memories of these transitional times. No matter how much we tell them, “Listen, you don’t understand,” they always look back at us, with some frustration, thinking they do understand. Still, we know they don’t. They can’t even begin to fathom all that they do not know. Though we never like to see them go through pain, we sigh and realize the experiences of life will bring home these lessons. The reality is that most investor’s and advisor’s (myself included) only experience with a bear market is the period from 2000 to 2002.

We have no memory of the struggles that occurred in the 70’s, when inflation ripped through the bond market. We have no life stories of what it was like to experience the Dow Jones Industrials getting crushed in three, deep bear markets over eight years, declining from 991 in 1966 to 596 in 1974. Sadly enough, our ignorance is not because of a lack of information. Rather, it is because, with thousands investing and advising in the same way, with no long-term bear experience, it is just easier to buy into the simple ideas, put the 2000 to 2002 period behind us, thank God for the Feds cutting rates and allowing a historical flood of credit, and follow the masses into a comfortable future. After all, most of our friends are doing the same. It must be right.

This issue will focus on a variety of pictures, making it clear that some investors and advisors have been willing to ask tough questions. And, just like high school, when common sense says that the investing crowd is wrong, we must have the fortitude to stand our ground. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then we all can learn a lot from the following “lectures.”

MORE. . .

The contents of this letter/report does not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.

The content of this message is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. It is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.

-- posted by Normxxx

» Normxxx - Short Interest: BULLISH

By Henry K. To, CFA | 23 August 2005

Dear Subscribers and Readers,

We switched from a neutral position to a 25% short position in our DJIA Timing System on the morning of July 14th at DJIA 10,616. As of Friday at the close, the Dow Industrials stood at 10,559.23— giving us a slight gain of approximately 56 points. The market should remain relatively quiet this week— both the IPO calendar and volume transactions will not pick up again until after the Labor Day Weekend. For now, the key indicators to watch are still the Bank Index, energy prices, and the housing market. No new signals are expected this week— for now, the market is mired in a ST downtrend and this author is expecting this downtrend to continue, despite the fact that many commentators is calling for the beginning of a bull trend sometime this week. More details to come in the following paragraphs.

Dear readers, please continue to give us feedback on our commentaries and discussion forum so that we can better understand how to serve all of you going forward. Again, we will be shifting to a subscription model as of October 1st. However, we will also be offering a free 30-day trial subscription for all first-time subscribers (which does not include our current subscribers in our mailing list) and a discounted $39 six-month subscription for the first six months (i.e. between November 1, 2005 and May 1, 2006). From May 1, 2006 and onwards, an annual subscription to our commentaries will be $99 per year (with appropriate adjustments for a monthly or a six-month subscription).

Here is a thought for this week: Following is a quote from Dr. Stephen Covey's new book, “The 8th Habit”: “When asked specifically what is truly unique about this book that adds value to the leadership material on the market, Covey responds, 'I would say [several] things [but]: First— the sequential development. I know no book that focuses on the absolute necessity of personal development and integration before trust can be built at the relationship level.'

This author believes the idea and the necessity of “sequential development” is broader (and deeper) than that. Think about it— the United States of America has always been one of the world's most capitalistic countries. A significant number of foreign citizens who have not set foot in this country believe that the roads here are “paved with gold” and that getting wealthy in this country is really easy. In a way, that is true— but just like any other significant endeavor or milestone in life, it is really not as easy as figures like Mr. Robert Kiyosaki (of “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” fame) claim to be. For example, as savvy investors and traders, I bet that many of our subscribers have had at least one experience where a family member or co-worker had asked for stock tips (perhaps more often in the late 1990s than now)— thinking they can make money even though they do not plan to spend much time or effort in learning about the stock market or individual stocks. Obviously, that is not the case— as many of our subscribers can attest to. I believe the idea of sequential development is an absolute necessity— not only in making money in the financial markets but in having the ability to keep your gains as well. Remember, the financial markets is most probably the most competitive arena in the world today. The process is as important (if not more important) than the results. But then, I guess most of our subscribers know that already.

Let's now get on with our commentary. There are two things that I want to first discuss. First of all, the September NYMEX contract for crude oil is over $65 a barrel as I am typing this. Sure, the Market Vane's Bullish sentiment for crude oil is high— but both the 21-day and the 55-day moving average of the Market Vane's Bullish Sentiment are not as overbought as what they were during the three significant peak in oil prices in 2004— shown in the following daily chart depicting the WTI Crude Oil Spot Price vs. the Market Vane's Bullish Sentiment (which has been updated from last week)

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart01.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

The message of the above chart remains the same as last week— that crude oil prices can still go higher despite current extreme bullish sentiment in the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus. Moreover, one thing that caught my eye over the weekend was the sheer number of analysts and commentators already calling for a top in crude oil prices. Given the current situation in Ecuador and given that the worst part of hurricane season is only just beginning, one cannot be so sure at this point. While our MarketThoughts.com Global Diffusion Index is definitely calling for lower oil prices within the next three to six months, I would not touch crude oil with a ten-foot pole here. The fact of the matter is: No popular article that I have read so far this weekend is calling for higher crude oil prices. Because of this, the final ascent to the top may be more ferocious than any of us here could expect.

The second thing I want to discuss is this: Many of the same analysts and commentators are calling for higher equity prices ahead— despite the fact that many of the major market indices (including the Bank Index and the S&P homebuilding index) are still mired in at least ST downtrends. The most recent action of the NYSE McClellan Oscillator and Summation Index just says it all (following chart is courtesy of Decisionpoint.com):

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart02.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

Both the NYSE McClellan Oscillator and the Summation Index (which is basically a running count of the McClellan Oscillator) are breadth indicators— suggesting that the trend of most of the stocks that are traded on the NYSE exchange is down. The action of the NASDAQ McClellan Oscillator and the corresponding Summation Index is very similar. The fact that not many analysts or commentators are acknowledging the current downtrend combined with the lack of an oversold condition suggests the current downtrend in many of the major market indices should continue— at least until Labor Day Weekend. This will most probably also correspond with a period of still higher crude oil prices. Readers please stay tuned.

In Thursday's commentary, we discussed the fact that liquidity was waning— as evident by the relative underperformance of the Philadelphia Bank Index, declining M-3 growth, and declining cash levels in both cash and margin accounts of investors. Combined with the current downtrend and the lack of an oversold condition, and you have a great recipe for a continuation of the current correction in the market. However— as evident by the subject of our commentary— there is some longer-term encouragement for the bulls, as the total amount of short interest on the NYSE just recently rose to an all-time for the month ending August 15, 2005. The total amount of shares that are shorted on the NYSE is now at 8.59 billion shares— 27 million shares more than the prior record set on May 15, 2005 and only 381 million shares more than the short interest outstanding on October 15, 2002— right at the bottom of the last cyclical bear market. In a bull market, a higher short interest generally provides “fuel” for the bulls, as the general uptrend in prices tend to force speculators to cover their short positions— thus strengthening the existing uptrend.

[Normxxx Here:  And, in a bear market, it "cushions" the fall— as bears cover on the way down. ]

Following is a monthly chart showing the short interest outstanding on the NYSE vs. the Dow Industrials from November 15, 2000 to August 15, 2000:

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart03.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

While the amount of short interest on the NYSE is now at an all-time high, it does not necessarily imply immediately higher prices up ahead. In fact, the three-month increase in short interest is only 1.73%— substantially lower than the 10.79% increase in short interest for the three months ending May 15, 2005. My guess is that unless there is a huge jump in short interest during the next few weeks, the market will still be mired in a downtrend. Over the longer-run, however, an ever-increasing short interest is definitely good for the bulls.

To put this into clearer perspective, one should take a look at the NYSE Short Interest Ratio, which is basically the total amount of short interest outstanding on the NYSE divided by average daily volume. Recent bottoms (October 2002 and October 2004) have ended with the NYSE SI ratio at 6.7. During June of this year, the SI ratio spiked to a relatively high level of 6.2— but in retrospect, this relatively bullish development was still not enough to usher in a ST bottom for the stock market. While the total outstanding short interest on the NYSE is at an all-time high, the SI ratio is still “only” at 6.0— suggesting that short interest may not be quite high enough to signal at least a ST bottom in the stock market. Following is a monthly chart showing the NYSE Short Interest Ratio vs. the Dow Industrials from January 1994 to the present:

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart04.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

As I have mentioned earlier, the recent increase in short interest is a longer-term bullish development, but for now, it is still not high enough (and it has not spiked high enough in the last three months) to signal an impending stock market bottom. If I have to guess, I would most probably not put any money on the long side until the SI ratio spikes again to the 6.7 level— which would mean (at least) a further 10% increase in the total amount of short interest outstanding on the NYSE in the next few months.

Let's now take a look at the most recent action— starting with the following daily chart of the Dow Industrials vs. the Dow Transports:

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart05.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

For the week ending August 19, the Dow Industrials and the Dow Transports declined 41 and 29 points, respectively. The resiliency of the Dow Transports through record oil prices is nothing short of amazing. In a way, this signals the underlying strength in the economy, as most fuel costs (aside from the airlines') of the transportation companies have been passed through to their customers. However, it is also interesting to note that the Dow Industrials have been severely lagging over the last 20 months, and that the previous high in the Dow Industrials during early March of this year was still 800 points away from its all-time high made back in January 2000. For now, the Dow Transports is still giving us relatively bullish signals, but please note (not shown on this chart) that the Dow Industrials is sitting right at both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages. Should the Dow Industrials experience a significant decline in the coming week, then it would have convincingly broken these natural support levels.

Let's now take a look at our most popular sentiment charts— starting with the Bulls-Bears% Differential readings in the American Association of Individual Investors Survey vs. the Dow Industrials:

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart06.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

The AAII survey continues its volatile ways— with the bulls-bears% differential declining a full 22 percentage points during the latest week, and a huge 51 percentage points during the last three weeks! While this has sometimes meant at least a ST bottom, readers should also note that the most severe declines have occurred while the AAII survey is in oversold territory. More importantly, the oversold condition in this survey is not being confirmed by readings from either the Investors Intelligence Survey or the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus— suggesting that the market should still have some more downside to go.

As I mentioned above, the Bulls-Bears% Differential in the Investors Intelligence Survey is not confirming the oversold condition in the AAII survey. For the week, the Bulls-Bears% differential in the Investors Intelligence Survey declined from a highly overbought 39.8% reading to a milder 34.8% but still overbought nonetheless:

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart07.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

My guess is that this reading will continue to decline until it gets to oversold territory— thus signaling lower prices ahead. For now, we will stay 25% short in our DJIA Timing System.

[Normxxx Here:  For "Full Disclosure;" I, too, am short a small amount (in Rydex URSA and ARKTOS), but without conviction, just in case we don't get that "last" bounce I am still expecting. But in that case, I would just expect the market to "leak" its way down to a 'mild' bottom in the usual time frame— October or November. ]

Readers should keep in mind that the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus has been the most “correct” sentiment indicator out of our three sentiment indicators since January 2004— in that the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus never really got too oversold during the March 2004, May 2004, August 2004, October 2004, and April 2005 ST bottoms— thus signaling relatively weak rallies ahead. This has definitely proven true— contrary to the very oversold readings that we were getting from both the AAII and the Investors Intelligence Surveys during most of those ST bottoms. So what is the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus signaling now? Look no further than the chart below:

<img Width="520" src="http://www.marketthoughts.com/images/20050821/chart08.gif">
Click Here, or on the image, to see a larger, undistorted image.

After an 11-week consecutive string of 65%+ readings, the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus finally declined through 65% a couple of weeks ago— and it's now at 64%. The fact that the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus is reversing from such an overbought condition suggests that the environment should get pretty difficult for the bulls in the coming weeks. Again, I am still relatively comfortable with our 25% short position in our DJIA Timing System at this stage.

[Normxxx Here:  But, as I have repeatedly stated recently, take these 'sentiment' readings with a 'large grain of salt'— they tend to predict the past better than the future. Also, the 'smart money' sentiment— also a contrary indicator— has gone very bearish very quickly recently. ]

Conclusion: While the record-high short interest should be bullish in the longer-term— I am still relatively skeptical of the short to intermediate timeframe for the stock market as both the short interest and the short interest ratio has not spiked high enough to signal any impending bottom or reversal. Moreover, it is not obvious to me that crude oil prices have topped. Even though the Market Vane's Bullish Consensus for crude oil is very overbought, it is still not as extremely overbought as it was during the three peaks in 2004. Moreover, many prominent analysts and market watchers have already brushed aside the possibility that crude oil prices can still go higher, and since tops are inherently difficult to call, I would not even try to go there (I have done that to my dismay many times in my career). The Iraqi stoppage of oil exports (1.5 million barrels a day) is definitely not helpful, either. For now, I would not touch crude oil with a ten-foot pole.

[Normxxx Here:  That's long or short. ]

Signing off,

Henry K. To, CFA

[Normxxx Here:  I am expecting something of a repeat of last year— a tame Fall fall (but I am looking for one more good sized bounce first), a strong November and December, and another weak January — February next year. ]

The contents of this letter/report does not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.

The content of this message is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. It is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.

The contents of this letter/report does not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.

The content of this message is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. It is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.

-- posted by Normxxx

» SteveT - August 26, 2005 Sentiment

I am using the VTO report for the II data. http://vtoreport.com/sentiment/sentiment...
Note for clarification historic sentiment tables are for that current week and not the four-week moving average.

Investors Intelligence Bulls 56.8% Bears 25.0% Correction 18.2%
56.9/(56.8+25.0)=69.44%
Four Week Average = 72.08%

A few historic dates: 7-20-98 68.42% 10-12-98 47.41% 4-3-00 67.79% 1-1-01 64.10% 4-4-01 58.91% 9-17-01 52.0% 9-21-01 48.7% 7-19-02 47.2% 7-23-02 47.2% 10-9-02 50.0%

Sideline Money Bears + Correction =43.2%
Four Week Average = 42.38%
hairie has researched some fascinating numbers for all time high bulls readings going back to 1965. http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...
and lows from 1965-2003 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...

From Barron' s 8/29/05
The American Association of Individual Investors
Bulls 36.1% Bears 31.3% Neutral 32.6%
36.1/(36.1+31.3)=53.56%
Four Week Average = 54.69%

Historic dates for comparison:
7-16-98    44.3%        S&P 500 Close 1186.75
10-12-98   36.76%       S&P 500 Close  984.39
4-3-00     77.78%       S&P 500 Close 1505.97
1-1-01     58.82%       S&P 500 Close 1320.28
4-4-01     51.35%       S&P 500 Close 1103.25
9-10-01    47.34%       S&P 500 Close 1085.78
9-17-01    42.11%       S&P 500 Close 1038.77
9-21-01    41.08%       S&P 500 Close  965.80
7-19-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  847.75
7-23-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  797.70
10-9-02    42.36%       S&P 500 Close  776.76

As of August 26, 2005 close
The CBOE Put/Call ratio 10 day moving average is at .98. http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.we... The VIX Market Volatility Index closed Friday at 13.72. http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=%5evix&d=t

-- posted by SteveT

» number_cruncher - Re: Sentiment Chart

Hey Kirk, the chart/table up above has been deleted. Do you still have it?

-- posted by number_cruncher

» SteveT - 9-2-05 Sentiment

I am using the VTO report for the II data. http://vtoreport.com/sentiment/sentiment...
Note for clarification historic sentiment tables are for that current week and not the four-week moving average.

Investors Intelligence Bulls 51.1% Bears 27.3% Correction 21.6%
51.1/(51.1+27.3)=65.18%
Four Week Average = 70.45%

A few historic dates: 7-20-98 68.42% 10-12-98 47.41% 4-3-00 67.79% 1-1-01 64.10% 4-4-01 58.91% 9-17-01 52.0% 9-21-01 48.7% 7-19-02 47.2% 7-23-02 47.2% 10-9-02 50.0%

Sideline Money Bears + Correction =48.9%
Four Week Average = 43.93%
hairie has researched some fascinating numbers for all time high bulls readings going back to 1965. http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...
and lows from 1965-2003 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...

From Barron' s 9/2/05
The American Association of Individual Investors
Bulls 31.8% Bears 37.7% Neutral 30.5%
31.8/(31.8+37.7)=45.76%
Four Week Average = 49.75%

Historic dates for comparison:
7-16-98    44.3%        S&P 500 Close 1186.75
10-12-98   36.76%       S&P 500 Close  984.39
4-3-00     77.78%       S&P 500 Close 1505.97
1-1-01     58.82%       S&P 500 Close 1320.28
4-4-01     51.35%       S&P 500 Close 1103.25
9-10-01    47.34%       S&P 500 Close 1085.78
9-17-01    42.11%       S&P 500 Close 1038.77
9-21-01    41.08%       S&P 500 Close  965.80
7-19-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  847.75
7-23-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  797.70
10-9-02    42.36%       S&P 500 Close  776.76

As of September 2, 2005 close
The CBOE Put/Call ratio 10 day moving average is at .99. http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.we... The VIX Market Volatility Index closed Friday at 13.67. http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=%5evix&d=t

-- posted by SteveT

» number_cruncher - Re: Re: August 19, 2005 Sentiment

Norm, there is some truth to that. Since 1986, advisory sentiment has had a 16% R-squared, and a negative (contrary) slope, in predicting 12 months AHEAD. I know, cuz I ran the numbers myself.

However, that is largely due to the fact that, as you say, every bottom eventually reverses. And from a bottom, it would be expected that stocks would be higher 12 months later. After all, that is the definition of a "bottom".

So, "predicting" with sentiment IS predicting, but then, ANYONE could predict the market would be higher 12 months after a bottom.

Just my opinion.

-- posted by number_cruncher

» SteveT - September 16, 2005 Sentiment

I am using the VTO report for the II data. http://vtoreport.com/sentiment/sentiment...
Note for clarification historic sentiment tables are for that current week and not the four-week moving average.

Investors Intelligence Bulls 53.2 % Bears 26.6% Correction 20.2%
53.2/(53.2+26.6)=66.67%
Four Week Average = 66.58%

A few historic dates: 7-20-98 68.42% 10-12-98 47.41% 4-3-00 67.79% 1-1-01 64.10% 4-4-01 58.91% 9-17-01 52.0% 9-21-01 48.7% 7-19-02 47.2% 7-23-02 47.2% 10-9-02 50.0%

Sideline Money Bears + Correction =46.8%
Four Week Average = 46.7%
hairie has researched some fascinating numbers for all time high bulls readings going back to 1965. http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...
and lows from 1965-2003 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...

From Barron' s 9/19/05
The American Association of Individual Investors
Bulls 51.4% Bears 28.6% Neutral 20.0%
51.4/(51.4+28.6)= 64.25%
Four Week Average = 55.36%

Historic dates for comparison:
7-16-98    44.3%        S&P 500 Close 1186.75
10-12-98   36.76%       S&P 500 Close  984.39
4-3-00     77.78%       S&P 500 Close 1505.97
1-1-01     58.82%       S&P 500 Close 1320.28
4-4-01     51.35%       S&P 500 Close 1103.25
9-10-01    47.34%       S&P 500 Close 1085.78
9-17-01    42.11%       S&P 500 Close 1038.77
9-21-01    41.08%       S&P 500 Close  965.80
7-19-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  847.75
7-23-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  797.70
10-9-02    42.36%       S&P 500 Close  776.76

As of September 16, 2005 close
The CBOE Put/Call ratio 10 day moving average is at .90. http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.we... The VIX Market Volatility Index closed Friday at 11.22. http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=%5evix&d=t

-- posted by SteveT

» hairie31 - Deficits as a % of the Federal Budget

This could lead to inflation and higher interest rates.

I did some checking on what percent of the Federal Budget the deficits have been in the past.

Currently the deficit is around 13½ % of the Federal Budget.

A $ 500 Bilion deficit in 2006 would probably put the deficit at about 20 % of the budget

Certainly during the World Wars and the Depression era, the deficits were really huge. But for the period since World War II, we may be entering the upper
range.

Here are the biggest deficits as a percent of the Federal Budget

1919--72.25 %
1918--71.25 %
1943--69.5 %
1932--58.75 %
1942--58.35 %
1934--55 %
1936--52 %
1944--52 %
1945--51 %
1917--44 %
1940--32 %
1946--29 %
----------
1983--25 %
1985--22.4 %
1986--21.3 %
1992--21 %
1991--20 %
1976--19.8
1990--17.6
1982--17 %
1975--16 %

-- posted by hairie31

» SteveT - September 23, 2005 Sentiment

I am using the VTO report for the II data. http://vtoreport.com/sentiment/sentiment...
Note for clarification historic sentiment tables are for that current week and not the four-week moving average.

Investors Intelligence Bulls 54.3 % Bears 25.5% Correction 20.2%
54.3/(54.3+25.5)= 68.05%
Four Week Average = 66.22%

A few historic dates: 7-20-98 68.42% 10-12-98 47.41% 4-3-00 67.79% 1-1-01 64.10% 4-4-01 58.91% 9-17-01 52.0% 9-21-01 48.7% 7-19-02 47.2% 7-23-02 47.2% 10-9-02 50.0%

Sideline Money Bears + Correction =45.7%
Four Week Average = 47.33%
hairie has researched some fascinating numbers for all time high bulls readings going back to 1965. http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...
and lows from 1965-2003 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...

From Barron' s 9/26/05
The American Association of Individual Investors
Bulls 39.5% Bears 32.5% Neutral 28%
39.5/(39.5+28)= 54.86%
Four Week Average = 55.65%

Historic dates for comparison:
7-16-98    44.3%        S&P 500 Close 1186.75
10-12-98   36.76%       S&P 500 Close  984.39
4-3-00     77.78%       S&P 500 Close 1505.97
1-1-01     58.82%       S&P 500 Close 1320.28
4-4-01     51.35%       S&P 500 Close 1103.25
9-10-01    47.34%       S&P 500 Close 1085.78
9-17-01    42.11%       S&P 500 Close 1038.77
9-21-01    41.08%       S&P 500 Close  965.80
7-19-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  847.75
7-23-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  797.70
10-9-02    42.36%       S&P 500 Close  776.76

As of September 23, 2005 close
The CBOE Put/Call ratio 10 day moving average is at .99. http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.we... The VIX Market Volatility Index closed Friday at 12.96. http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=%5evix&d=t

-- posted by SteveT

» SteveT - September 30, 2005 Sentiment

The data from Investors Intelligence this week revealed something I find rather fascinating. The weekly reading is the same as it was two weeks ago. So is the four-week moving average! The sideline money is also the same and the four-week moving average sideline money is only .1% higher. Conversely the AAII numbers are showing signs of fear with over 68% of the money currently out of the market! Are the “pros” saying one thing and doing another? Will amateur instincts prove superior? Stay tuned.

I am using the VTO report for the II data. http://vtoreport.com/sentiment/sentiment...
Note for clarification historic sentiment tables are for that current week and not the four-week moving average.

Investors Intelligence Bulls 53.2 % Bears 26.6% Correction 20.2%
53.2/(53.2+26.6)=66.67%
Four Week Average = 66.58%

A few historic dates: 7-20-98 68.42% 10-12-98 47.41% 4-3-00 67.79% 1-1-01 64.10% 4-4-01 58.91% 9-17-01 52.0% 9-21-01 48.7% 7-19-02 47.2% 7-23-02 47.2% 10-9-02 50.0%

Sideline Money Bears + Correction =46.8%
Four Week Average = 46.8%
hairie has researched some fascinating numbers for all time high bulls readings going back to 1965. http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...
and lows from 1965-2003 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/i...

From Barron' s 10/3/05
The American Association of Individual Investors
Bulls 31.9% Bears 39.1% Neutral 29.0%
31.9/(31.9+39.1)= 44.93%
Four Week Average = 55.4%

Historic dates for comparison:
7-16-98    44.3%        S&P 500 Close 1186.75
10-12-98   36.76%       S&P 500 Close  984.39
4-3-00     77.78%       S&P 500 Close 1505.97
1-1-01     58.82%       S&P 500 Close 1320.28
4-4-01     51.35%       S&P 500 Close 1103.25
9-10-01    47.34%       S&P 500 Close 1085.78
9-17-01    42.11%       S&P 500 Close 1038.77
9-21-01    41.08%       S&P 500 Close  965.80
7-19-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  847.75
7-23-02    32.88%       S&P 500 Close  797.70
10-9-02    42.36%       S&P 500 Close  776.76

As of September 30, 2005 close
The CBOE Put/Call ratio 10 day moving average is at .99. http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.we... The VIX Market Volatility Index closed Friday at 12.15. http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=%5evix&d=t

-- posted by SteveT