|
|||||
Market Indicators - Investor Sentiment
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 Next » » SteveT - Re: Re: 3-8-34 Sentiment In response to message posted by Normxxx:Norm, I don't pretend to know if what I posted means anything. -- posted by SteveT » Normxxx - Re: Re: Re: 3-8-34 Sentiment In response to message posted by SteveT:Unfortunately, so many indicators are giving weird, anomalous, or off-scale readings (both ways), that it is hard to get any fix on this market, even for contrarians. I think that this is a sign that there is no real bias in the market-- it could go either way, and big. But to go down big I think will need a catalyst; to go up big will require just time, it will just gradually move its range on up over the next year or so. I am still looking for a top in '05 but no major down move until '06. Best bet is to stay fully invested in a relatively conservative portfolio (e.g., low PEs and relatively high dividends) and be prepared to move at a moment's notice. Remember, half the people in the market are poised to exit at the first sign of panic-- devil take the hindmost! From A Usually Reliable Source The long term picture for stock prices looks very good in 2004, with the next “bear market” still years away. Continued inflows of liquidity will be the key to continuing the positive trend. But that does not mean that we cannot nor will not see an intermediate term correction in the mean time. The next 20-week cycle low is ideally due April 20 (plus or minus a few weeks), and so sometime between now and then the recent up wave will have to come to a pause. Expect at least a short term bottom March 30 to April 8. Bonds are still tracking well toward a higher high, with a top due in May. Gold should see a very robust rebound from recent weakness, leading to an April top, and then a multi-year decline. Look at any strength in gold stocks as a last-chance gift to get out at favorable prices. There is an important 40-year cycle in [Normxxx Here: I tend to agree with the 40-year cycle (actually sometimes 20-years), but I do not think it as prescriptive of the markets as the author of the preceding piece. ] -- posted by Normxxx » SteveT - 3-15-04 Sentiment I am using the VTO report for the II data. http://vtoreport.com/sentiment/sentiment...Note for clarification historic sentiment tables are for that current week and not the four-week moving average.
Sideline Money Bears + Correction =43.9%
Sideline Money Bears + Neutral = 58.7% Four Week Average = 53.23% For more info on AAII check out their web site. http://www.aaii.com
-- posted by SteveT » Normxxx - Recent insider selling is ominous Recent insider selling is ominous By Mark Hulbert, CBS.MarketWatch.com | 12:01 AM ET March 19, 2004 ANNANDALE, Va. (CBS.MW) - Not all insider selling is created equal. We should be much more worried about some kinds than others. Unfortunately, we may be witnessing the worrying kind right now. Insiders, of course, are a company's officers and directors as well as its largest shareholders. They are required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission all transactions involving their companies' stock, and the SEC makes those reports public. It stands to reason that we pay attention to insiders, since they presumably know more about their companies' prospects than you or I do. Yet insiders have been extremely heavy sellers over the past 12 months. Those who assumed that all insider selling is equally bearish, and therefore went to cash when insiders became heavy sellers, have missed out on the market's rise of more than 30 percent over the past year. Yet, as I pointed out in a column last fall, insider selling is not particularly bearish if it occurs in the wake of a rising stock market. I based that column on research by H. Nejat Seyhun, a finance professor at the University of Michigan, who has devoted much of his professional career to studying insider behavior. Only if insider selling occurs in the wake of a market decline does it foretell likely market weakness, according to Seyhun. The implication of his research therefore was that investors could draw no conclusions from insider selling so long as the market continued to go up. But, Seyhun told me in September, "if prices begin to decline from [current levels] and insider selling continues and/or accelerates" he would advise getting out of stocks. Which brings us back to the present: The stock market in recent weeks has experienced its first correction in excess of 5 percent since the market took off a year ago. And though we only have early precincts reporting - because not all insiders immediately report their trades -- it looks like the pace of insider selling increased during the recent correction. For data on insider selling, I turn to Vickers Stock Research, publishers of Vickers Weekly Insider Report. Vickers gathers the insider data that are reported to the SEC and, among a number of other things it does with the data, calculates an overall ratio of insider sales to insider purchases. <img BORDER="0" width="400" src="http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/image.as..."> That is not a good sign, especially if this trend were to continue. The only consolation is that insiders tend to be early. Academic researchers have found that insiders anticipate downturns in their companies' earnings by at least three calendar quarters, and as much as nine calendar quarters. So, on the assumption that recent insider selling is indeed bearish, we still may have at least until the end of this year before the bad news they are anticipating comes to pass. -- posted by Normxxx » SteveT - 3-22-04 Sentiment What a difference a week or two makes. Both II and AAII bullishness is creeping down slowly and it is beginning to look like the undecided maybe asserting themselves. The VIX has been inching upward the past few weeks. The Put/Call is approaching 1. The last time the ten day moving average was in that area was mid February 2003 just before the market took off. The time before that was in late September 2002 just prior to the bear market low that occurred in October 2002. Is this a sign this pullback will be short lived and small? Let’s hope so. I guess we will know in the coming weeks. I am using the VTO report for the II data. http://vtoreport.com/sentiment/sentiment...
Sideline Money Bears + Correction =47.5%
Sideline Money Bears + Neutral = 61.4% Four Week Average = 57.68% For more info on AAII check out their web site. http://www.aaii.com
-- posted by SteveT » hairie31 - Looking at 2004-2005 Here my current thinking.After being uncorrectly bearish in 2003, largely based on sentiment and valuations, I missed the 1 year rally in the Stock Market. However, I haven't lost any money and am still 100 % in cash and should something go very wrong this year, I ready to jump in aggressively. I should say first, I think the market will probably soar in 2005. I've looked at all the indicators to predict the market direction. They all have stopped working at some point. The only one so far that hasn't failed is that years ending in "5" are up and the best performing year of the decade. Maybe 2005 will be the first time this indicator fails...but I think there is something to this middle of the decade indicator. So what would make the markets soar in 2005? There's got to be a excuse. How about a massive decline into November 2004, that takes everyone by surprise, just after record amounts of money reentered the market in early 2004 and sentiment was more bullish than in the 1999-2000 bubble! So from a low in November 2004, a perhaps a rally taking the market soaring into January 2006, where I'd dump everything. Also, the past three decades of years ending in "4" have not been good years: 1974(-27.6), 1984(-3.7) I've been religiously following INTC as a "Early Warning Alarm" for the entire market. The first top at 34.12 on November 6, 2003 and a double top of 34.24 on January 8, 2004. Since January 8, 2004, INTC is down Even if the S & P only declines 20 %, INTC could plunge -70 %. If INTC plunges to $ 15 a share or less, this time I aggressively BUY. I think a Bush Re-election was prematurely baked into the market, STILL...sentiment is very bullish! Lastest Investor's Intelligence is Latest AAII is 59.47 (Bulls: 38.6, Bears: 26.3) This leads me to believe that the correction has barely started. I'd like to see the market slowly bleed to death into November. Whether such a decline matches or exceeds the Oct, 2002 low will be interesting to see. I always thought 2006-7 or 2010 would be final bottom of this Secular Bear Market. Maybe the it could all happen this year????? Now... all we need is some Terrorist Type event to add a super-negative stimulant to the beginning down trend in the market and turn this decline into a massive panic. Maybe then, bearish sentiment will take over, as investors panic, give up and sell. One things I've really learned from the Oct 2002 -February 2004 rally is that when you're totally certain the market will only go one diretion.....it can do the exact opposite! The next observation is that; it is one thing to be 100% in cash and miss out of a big rally (that's bad enough) it's another thing to be so certain that you go 200% Short the Nasdaq 100, case in point...one, Doug Fabian. So..Bearish, yes....short, NEVER. I could be totally wrong like last year! -- posted by hairie31 » SteveT - Re: Looking at 2004-2005 In response to message posted by hairie31:
-- posted by SteveT » hairie31 - Dow 10,000: Line in the Sand *Hard to believe, but the Dow's first close over 10,000 was on March 29, 1999 (Dow 10,006.78) Almost five years ago. Today's interday low in the Dow was 10,007.49. I was surprised the Dow ever got much over 10,OOO. The Dow never fully got over the 100 point level, from 1906 till 1942, some 36 years later. The 1,000 barrier lasted about 18 ½ years from January 1966 to a final low of 1,086 on July 24, 1984. So we may easily have another 13 years (or maybe a lot more than that) till the Dow clears 10,000 for the last time. My sense is we'll be in a trading range from 6,000 to 12,000 in the Dow for many, many years. That my take based on previous history of the Stock Market. So will hold 10,000? Only a 49 point drop will put it under 10,000 and I think that will be a big psychological loss for the market. A real negative for sentiment. Of course..the market will do what ever it wants and can fool everyone Stay tuned...the market is getting interesting! -- posted by hairie31 » Normxxx - Can the Stock Market Be Propped Up? Can the Stock Market Be Propped Up by “Organized Support”? It Failed Miserably in 1929 http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wra... "There can be few fields of human endeavor in which history counts for so little as in the world of finance. Past experience, to the extent that it is part of memory at all, is dimissed as the primative refuge of those who do not have the insight to appreciate the incredible wonders of the present." There is a significant amount of public opinion that the stock market will be supported from crashing by some form of organized support such as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT). I don’t know how many times people have said to me that the stock market would hold up, at least until the presidential election. Count me in the apparent minority who thinks that no amount of real or perceived organized support will prevent the market from going where the law of supply and demand takes it. Accordingly, while I don’t think that the rally from the October 2002 lows was fundamentally healthy, I do think it was based on simple supply and demand for stocks. The rally should be respected, and treated objectively. There is a buyer and a seller for every transaction. -- posted by Normxxx « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||