Jim Rogers and Paige Parker: Re: Re: Re: Getting our money back


  1. lessismore

This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.



Top 1.   Feb 2, 2006 5:44 PM

» lessismore - Re: Re: Re: Getting our money back

I was going to send you a copy of the complaint. It offers some interesting details.
My main contention(and one of the lawsuit's also) is that Beeland was looking at Refco as a potential investor in Beeland. They did not exercise due diligence when putting the funds' assets in Refco's hands because they were more interested in wooing Refco.
There are some other very curious details in the complaint that, if true, don't paint the management at Beeland in a very positive light.
I feel the same way about lawsuits, but I'm afraid we will see little of our money if we content ourselves with the Refco bankruptcy distribution.
Just my two cents.


In response to Re: Re: Getting our money back posted by DrAziz:

-- posted by lessismore


Post this Discussion Post to facebook Add this Discussion Post to del.icio.us! Digg this Discussion Post furl this Discussion Post Add this Discussion Post to Reddit Add this Discussion Post to Technorati Add this Discussion Post to Newsvine Add this Discussion Post to Windows Live Add this Discussion Post to Yahoo Add this Discussion Post to StumbleUpon Add this Discussion Post to BlinkLists Add this Discussion Post to Spurl Add this Discussion Post to Google Add this Discussion Post to Ask Add this Discussion Post to Squidoo


Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.