Jim Rogers and Paige Parker: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Forgot to Mention An Important Fact -- R

» standard - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Forgot to Mention An Important Fact -- R

In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Forgot to Mention An Important Fact -- Re: R posted by lessismore:

Kim, you're not alone. I invested because I needed help, and i know that indexes beat managed accounts more often than not. But I would recommend not appologizing to anyone for asking questions. I think we all should have asked more. Insinuating that you're naive will lead more con men to your door. I AM NOT AN AMATEUR, but because I would have had to take so much time spreading risk across so many areas, I thought this fund would help.

Now I have to say tha I was unimpressed with Jim Rogers on TV the other day and would not consider his TRAKRS. I just wouldn't. He owes us a better explanation.

He should addres REFCO's point that the Beeland people authorized every contract, per the new article posted above.

He justs waves his hand and says, "Clear paper trail."

Did they authorize multiple transfers or not and if so, why?

We need answers.

-- posted by standard