|
|
THREAD IS CLOSED! --- Bob Brinker Free Discussion Site 11K+
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 Next » » ACousins - Re: Brinker's Record In response to message posted by ojo_zarco:For those of you who continue your relentless bashing, please do me one little favor--post your portfolio recommendations here so that your recommendations can be benchmarked. I think that would only be fair. You misunderstand this thread completely. Do you understand the difference between we as consumers and Bob as producer? We pay him for advice, he doesn't pay us (except by offending us). He chose the profession, chose to be on the air, chose to make fun of other professionals, chose to make the Q52 trade, etc. He has acted very, very badly toward others and now he is getting his due by having his behavior criticized. -- posted by ACousins » ACousins - Re: Re: Marketimer Excerpts In response to message posted by Centigrade233:Carnegie Mellon Data Center has no authorization to reprint any material from the copyrighted Marketimer at any time. They have confirmed this fact. Well that is a new low. They're reading all of these posts again? If that's true (and who can tell these days?) then here is me shouting: Go back to work on the numbers Bob! That would be much more helpful for your position rather than going after your customer base. If you got your numbers right AND/OR you treated your customers with respect this board would disppear all by itself. ++++++++ Also, is that a slander of you? Saying that the data center confirmed that fact? -- posted by ACousins » kwynn - "Women on the Warpath!"" That Stephanie is one crazy chickThu. 01/11/01 - "Women on the Warpath!"" Our cameras join Stephanie in her home as she prepares dinner for her family and then we follow her to a bar as she confronts her husband about his constant absence. In studio, husband Mike, tells us that he is tired of Stephanie's complaining and plans to tell her he's cheating… with her best friend! This is the last straw - Stephanie is through! Then… Sanje has some bad news for her sister, Shirrell… She's been sleeping with her man! . -- posted by kwynn » ACousins - Re: "Women on the Warpath!"" In response to message posted by kwynn:Well, more proof of the kind of person (ad hominem arguments approach) that is attracted to the ugly dark underside. Perhaps the Springer show should be notified about unauthorized summaries by the fans of BB. Excerpted from MT or was it the radio show? "The.." -- posted by ACousins » DanG_6 - Fair Questions, Rande In response to message posted by Rande:Ok, I'll give it a shot. Has Brinker's newsletter performance FAILED to beat every reasonable benchmark index and active peer group since 1/1/88? Yes. Have Brinker's specific stock and fund picks been more wrong than right? Yes. Is Brinker a humble, honest individual? Are you KIDDING? :-) Why do people show such allegiance to yet another failed guru, and a nasty one at that? I guess because he's entertaining and when he's just talking basic long term strategy, he's pretty convincing--and right, in my opinion. Yes, I know, the market timing part is up for debate, but the other stuff (asset allocation, diversification, etc.) is pretty prudent advice. Would people be better off following a buy-and-hold long term approach? Probably. Or possibly just as well. But I'm holding out for him being right about his timing signal. I admit it is not a necessity for investment success, but it reduced market risk in a time of rampant speculation, and for those more interested in capital preservation than in attempting to maximize performance, it was a pretty good call as far as I'm concerned. Isn't it a worthwhile endeavor to point these things out so that more investors will have a chance for long term success? Yes, as long as it's done fairly and objectively. That's definitely hard to do given Bob's personality and, but anything less is not very useful in my opinion. Well, that's it. Now let's see if I get my next Marketimer delivered, or a personal phone call from Bob instead, explaining that he can no longer be of any service to me! -- posted by DanG_6 » joe_fabitz - Re: Re: New Title: What is your opinion? In response to message posted by Kirk:Re:How would YOU interpret this bit of writing by Brinker? Par9 Pg1 Jan01 MT: (numbers changed to protect subscriber data) "we are expecting potential gains for the Nasdaq100 Index of up to xx% or more as measured from the JanYY closing low of ZZZ or any subsequent minor new closing low in the very near-term." "of up to" "or more" Doesn't that just about include every number? Kirk, -- posted by joe_fabitz » kwynn - Different Shows Jerry recently had a show on these two twin girls that were both doing the one twins fiance and they were in the lemo fighting over him. The one twin kept sitting next to her and she would get up and move to the other side of the lemo. They kept doing that for about 5 minutes. I also seen them on Ricki Lake. It was the same thing. The one sister told her she was sleeping with her man and she seemed all suprised. I couldn't believe they came and did the same show on Jerry Springer. Don't they ever find out if they have ever been on another show. I seen both shows in the same week-- posted by kwynn » kwynn - To all of you who bash this show, I would just like to say that To all of you who bash this show, I would just like to say that its just entertainment. This society has become so comsumed with the concept that tv radio music are ruining lives and family values that they can't look past just plain old good fun. Shows like Springer and Brinkers were created for the purpose of entertaining viewers like me. If you do not like the content on his show, it is your right to NOT WATCH OR LISTEN! If you complain about this being on tv,radio change your channels. There are many others that you can chose from. Let viewers like me continue to thrive on the humor of these so-called "smut" and "investing" shows. .-- posted by kwynn » ACousins - Re: To all of you who bash this show, I would just like to say t In response to message posted by kwynn:..it is your right to NOT WATCH OR LISTEN.. We actually did not know that until you stated it here. Thank you very much for your public service. We also have the right to criticize errors, complain about bad service, point out problems, talk back to management, etc. If you don't like that, you do have the right to post (or not) on Justa's thread: http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk... I hope you will find this more boorish and, therefore, possibly more to your liking. I'm sure BB will appreciate your pointing out that part of his demographics overlaps with those of Jerry's. -- posted by ACousins » kwynn - Merger Since Aol and Time Warner merged would it be feasible for Bob and Jerry to merge? Bob can give investment advice to Jerry`s guests.(lets face it they need help financially) and Jerry will have access to Bobs radio callers and chat rooms (they need more Jerry in thier life)Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! -- posted by kwynn « Previous 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|