|
|
GGR: GeoGlobal Resources Inc [was GEOG was BOWG] (2000 + )
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Next » » Wendell - Re: Re: SHORT In response to message posted by Kirk:Kirk, maybe we are the ones with guts, holding onto a shell of a company and hoping for the best. Not having any intention of turning any of my shares loose at this time. Quite a shell game we have going here. Maybe end up paying the piper before all is said and done. Keep the faith -- posted by Wendell » Kirk - Three Up Days .<img src=http://cbs.marketwatch.com/charts/int-ad... width=452 height=469> I'm not sure if this applies after a correction or consolidation.... but look at what happened the last time we had this pattern. Candlesticks: Three White Soldiers TA is often wrong, but I thought it would be interesting to point this out. The candle sticks are not that long and we had more of a consolidation of a gain rather than a correction so I don't think it really applies... but it is interesting that we have such strong moves after a consolidation when the overall market sucks. My personal and newsletter BOWG buys and sells are announced via email to my newsletter subscribers as they happen. I post them here on occasion if I remember, have time or feel like it AFTER THE FACT so it clear it is not a recommendation. This allows me to have tons of disclaimers in my newsletter saying how this is a risky stock, etc... and how you should manage risk in an overall scheme of things.
-- posted by Kirk » Wendell - Re: Re: Three Up Days In response to message posted by Hu:Of course Hugs, this stock was just waiting around for you to show up again, as was I. Good to hear from you Mr. Hugs, even if it is for a wee bit at a time. Thanks for your reentrance in this great land of the BOWG. As usual Hugs, I don,t know what the heck I am talking about. -- posted by Wendell » Hu - Re: Re: Re: Three Up Days In response to message posted by Wendell:Quite okay, Wendell. Neither do I. But it was hard not to comment on this wild and silly thing, after thinking myself so clever feeding the face of it's run last month. But holy, moly. Can you believe where it's still headed? Ha! Guess it ignored my wimpy offerings. Musta thought of them as appetizers, or something. Run, baby. Run. (Daddy's got more, but ya got's the low ones. Get's to jumpin' higher if ya wants 'em.) -- posted by Hu » Wendell - Raging Bull 1915 posts -- # posts per pg10 per page20 per page30 per page40 per page50 per page Msg. # « Previous 30 | Next 30 »Post new msg. | Refresh list Add to fav. boards Msg. # Subject Posted by Date 1915 (Because... me no a little.) menoalittle 14 Feb 2003 6:26 PM EST 1914 Is this long weekend one that BOWG longs should be menoalittle 14 Feb 2003 -- posted by Wendell » Whirlwind - Re: Three Up Days In response to message posted by Kirk:
Shorting after such a run-up is common practice. Given all the loopholes that can allow shorters to roll over their positions for 3 years before covering (in three years time most penny stocks go back to visit their vomit) and scaremongers/crooks like A&P who recruit fellow shorters to bag a target, shorting isn't all that hazardous given the extent of the current run-up. If the company is healthy and cash flush one still can short and cover a tumble at the overbought stage. -- posted by Whirlwind » Wendell - From EL Toro Malo Message list Add to favorite boardsMsg. # « Previous | Next » Reply to msg. Post new msg. Email this msg. By: drs774tx 15 Feb 2003, 05:37 PM EST Msg. 1918 of 1918 Does anyone have the TA agents name and phone number for BOWG? That should setup an alarm to cover any short coming at us :o) However, it has not been the MO of this company up til now to short it's own stock. Outstanding shares of only 13+Mil. says it all for the past, but then again 100Mil. setting on top of us :o( It is a smart person who watches their back. Wish we knew more about who they are talking too. IMHO, Still an excellent investment at this time!!!! David (Voluntary -- posted by Wendell » Hu - Re: Re: Three Up Days In response to message posted by Whirlwind:First, read my post on the energy board here. If there are some shorting of Bowg right now, it's certainly not the average investor. Most (if not all, nowadays) brokerages simply won't allow shorting of stocks under 5 or 6 bucks. Honestly, I find it difficult to believe the average investors have been (or are) interested in buying it at any price level. Why would or should they? It just makes no sense to. It appears to me (who knows nought) that the bulk of the recent activity (aside from a lot of old "stuckholders" finally cutting loose of the shares that previously might not of made sense to sell at 25 cents a share if they also had to incur the expense of brokerage fees) would be coming from some "other money" that had reason to move the price. On the surface, it looks like someone must have accumulated a lot of shares. Why? In fact, it's probably much, much easier to reason why the stock has been professionally shorted (brokerages can short any stock at any price)... like you did in your post. It just "looks like" it was an easy target. Too fast, too far, and WAY too high. Just start selling, because it will undoubtedly and inevitably return to earth. But... who in the heck is doing all the buying at such an outrageous price as a buck, not to mention a buck and 2 bits? And who, or how, or why, and where is this stock being "pumped" by and for and from? The "rumors" seemed to surface well after the last big run up. Isn't that just plain backwards? In fact, why would anyone bother to even pay any attention to them if they were so late in arriving? What was sold is sold. There'll be no buying them shares back at a higher price than they were sold for, that's for sure. So scratch off any "long time holders" of BOWG being responsible for the recent run. Who else would bother to pay any attention to this low life stock until after it sprang to life? The volume dissapeared almost as quickly as it came. And yet, here the darn thing is drifting higher on low volume. That simply shouldn't be. Unless, of course, something changed. Somebody wanted the stock, paid up for it, and now... it appears they're perfectly content to sit on it. Was it professionally shorted? Maybe. But, why ain't it going down? What a bad feeling can start eating away in the pit of your stomach when you slowly start to realize you just shorted something you didn't understand, and for the wrong reason. (In fact, when you put on paper "the slow drift down" that results from delusional traders gradually realizing the possiblity of a quick gain from their long position is fading... what if you turn that around and consider it from other traders taking a short position? Might it slowly drift up? Probably.) BOWG is just a wild ass little beast right now that is as unpredictable as the wind. From either the long side, or the short side... it can wheel around on you and gore the livin' piss out of you in a heartbeat. -- posted by Hu « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|