This archived discussion is "read only".
For the corresponding "live" discussions, post in the active topic forum here.
« Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »
» Happy_2 - Re: Google is the ghost of Dotcom past.
In response to Google is the ghost of Dotcom past. posted by BoltonCT:Cramer forgets to mention this, and has it both ways. As usual.
-- posted by Happy_2
» UPOD_2006 - Re: Jaloti's Review of "Mad Money"
In response to Jaloti's Review of "Mad Money" posted by Kirk:Wow! Did you see HANS today?! Cramer called it! Thanks ]
[ Kirk's Editor Comment: Please copy a summary here when you make these posts. We allow links to other sites who return the favor to us, but we do not allow other sites to advertise on our site to try and get our traffic. I am sure you understand. If you would like to give us a prominently displayed link on your site saying your readers can comment on Jim Cramer’s comments on our site, than I am more than willing to send traffic your way. That is, we can host a discussion forum for your site. Send me an email and we can discuss the details of how we can cross promote each other’s web sites.
-- posted by UPOD_2006
» Bill_Duffy - Re: Oh Oh... FedEx & UPS
.Perhaps someone on his staff read your newsletter.
-- posted by Bill_Duffy
» Happy_2 - Cramer Crows
I heard Cramer's crowing yesterday about his Google pick this year. What he forgot to mention was the day he leaned into the camera and said "lighten up".Goog had been trading down for a few days and was at about 230.
One stock that Cramer had pushed, I have follwed. This was CPST. They make steam turbines, and had just gotten some Walmart business. Cramer said to buy at 4. It is now in the 2's. He never mentioned this one.
-- posted by Happy_2
» smile_1 - est 50% batting avg - Cramer vs Cramer graphic
Looks to me just by eyeballing like his batting average is around 50%. It would be good to see someone do an even weight analysis to see the truth about Cramer.
I've seen many use him as a contrary indicator.
Pisses me off to see people jumping in and out of stocks not based on their own dd but on Cramer's. Nothing wrong with getting ideas from Cramer.
Anyway I did a msn search (search.msn.com) and found a blog where someone had tracked Cramer's calls thru 12/14/05 results:
_____________________
http://www.reasonedinvesting.com/2005/10...
Sid Vaidya Says:
December 14th, 2005 at 3:40 pm
I did some basic analysis on the performance of Cramer?s investment calls.
To date he has made calls on approximately 800 stocks. Of the 839 different calls, 398 went against him and 441 worked out in his favour.
However, when you look at the average magnitude, the average incorrect call saw a -4.69% return while the correct calls had an average return of 2.28%.
Time period wasn't taken into consideration. The analysis was done by simply taking all the stocks reported in the Mad Money Performance section
as of Dec 13th.
Wish the investing public was aware of this track record. Also wish CNBC was made aware of the
amount of damage that this guy is actually doing. I have found him to be one of the best contrarian indicators, at lease when it comes to invest in oil and gas stocks.
Regards,
Sid
-- posted by smile_1
» prognosticator - Cramer's Mad Money program
That a show like Mad Money is even on the air is a sure sign of a market top.-- posted by prognosticator
» honeyoneohone - GGR?
In response to NMT or NMTI? posted by Kirk:-- posted by honeyoneohone
» Kirk - New Articles
.FNSR: Finisar
Make sure you read my article FNSR: Finisar
See FNSR: Finisar Charts
PTSC: Patriot Scientific
Make sure you read my article PTSC: Patriot Scientific dated Feb 22, 2006
See PTSC: Patriot Scientific Charts
.
Kirk Lindstrom: http://investment.suite101.com/
DISCLAIMER: Answers & my words are general in nature, are not meant as specific investment advice, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of anyone but Kirk. Individuals should consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.
.
Click for a Free Sample of my Newsletterand to get on my email distribution list for notification of new articles here, free charts and much more.
-- posted by Kirk
» Kirk - PLEASE USE NEW FORUM ON NEW SITE
.This forum is now closed. Please use the new Jim Cramer forum for your discussion.
Thanks!
Click for a Free Sample of my Newsletter and to get on my email distribution list for notification of new articles here, free charts and much more.
As of 12/31/05 the Total Return for “Kirk's Newsletter Explore Portfolio" since 12/31/98 is Up 197% while the S&P500 only up 12%!!! & NASDAQ only up 1%!!! For 2006, it is already up 5% YTD!
Kirk Lindstrom: http://investment.suite101.com/
DISCLAIMER: Answers & my words are general in nature, are not meant as specific investment advice, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of anyone but Kirk. Individuals should consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.
-- posted by Kirk
» Kirk - Cramer’s top 10 picks in Feb. 2000
.
Cramer’s top 10 picks in Feb. 2000
It was written years ago but someone got it deleted on this old site many years after it was written.... I wonder why they care?
Read Cramer’s top 10 picks in Feb. 2000 and find out!
Click To Get On My FREE STUFF Mailing List. Get notification of new articles, updates on I Bonds, free Fixed Income and other charts PLUS much more.
As of 6/6/06 the Total Return for “Kirk's Newsletter Explore Portfolio" since 12/31/98 is Up 216% while the S&P500 only up 14%!!! & NASDAQ down 1.3
=>> for 2006, my newsletter portfolio is up 7.4% YTD vs. QQQQ down 4.1%YTD!.
Kirk Lindstrom:
DISCLAIMER: Answers & my words are general in nature, are not meant as specific investment advice, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of anyone but Kirk. Individuals should consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.
-- posted by Kirk
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.