|
|
Ask Rande
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 Next » » RandeS - Tony, Tony,Yes, you can view and download on line. Here's the link, once again, to the IRS publication file manager. Just scroll down to see the list of publications. Highlight number 550 and follow the instructions for viewing/download. You'll need Acrobat. BTW, there's a lot of stuff at this site that's prety good. Pub 17 is a good overview of basic individual income tax compliance, there's a publication on mutual fund reporting, IRAs, 403(b)s, etc. -- tons of stuff. -- posted by RandeS -- posted by TONYBRIG » MichaelC_AU - % of daytraders losing? Seems like I heard that %75 of daytraders lose money overall over time, this statistic was widely used when the Atlanta shootings were front page.If this is true wouldn't it be important to warn all the Tonys out here! -- posted by MichaelC_AU » TONYBRIG - The Tonys out there view it as a plus The Tonys out there view it as a plus.That means my competition loses 3/4 so an edge for me. If 25% can do it then why not me? Follow a statistic blindly based on a figure and one is very narrowminded. Day Trading is a new Industry it takes time to weed out the losers both individuals and Companies. The statistic will change upwardly as this Vehicle moves forward. Two sides to every coin. So if this is true then one should consider shorting the Day Traders buys and vice versa! vbolhh -- posted by TONYBRIG » KirkL - No Tony No TonyYou don't understand it yet. You DON'T short the day traders picks, the picks are random. You charge them $20 to $25 per trade each way and encourage them to make 10 to 100 trades a day and make sure they are all closed before they go home. THAT is how you make money if you own a Day Trading School. Take the House odds. Ever hear of a good gambler getting rich by doing the opposite of an unlucky one? -- posted by KirkL » RandeS - Kirk's point is a good one. Kirk's point is a good one. Day traders aren't going long or short based on any fundamental notion about a stock. It's all technically driven based on guesses regarding extremely short term dynamics. What the successful day traders try to do is get in between on the spreads, squeezing out an extremely small fraction here and there in the hope it will all add up to a decent day's wage by they time they're done. Trouble is the tens of thousands of dollars at stake to eke out a hundred or so and the risk the trade could backfire on you. Day traders who actually speculate on a stock outright, rather than trying to squeeze in between the spread, are even worse. Nothing more than a guess and a hope on minute-to-minute direction of a stock. Bring on the Rolaids. Michael makes a good point too, except that caveat emptor falls on deaf ears when the hope of quick riches enters the picture. We've talked a lot about the dangers of day trading and options trading at this site for some time. Tony and others of legal age who wish to make a go of it are entitled. At the very least, if you're going to do it you should at least know the tax rules and potential pitfalls and I think this site has done a lot to educate in that regard. One last thing about Tony's idea to do the opposite of the loser day traders. As Kirk says, that probably won't work too well. If you absolutely have to try your hand at day trading, though many of us advise against it, wouldn't it be better to seek out the 25% (10%?) or so who are successful at it and seek instead to emulate them?-- posted by RandeS » TONYBRIG - Gambler..........that word kicks in Gambler..........that word kicks inKirk said in part: "Ever hear of a good gambler getting rich by doing the opposite of an unlucky one?" vbolhh -- posted by TONYBRIG » RandeS - Tony, Tony,I may get "kicked" myself for saying this, but there ARE such things as astute gamblers. They tend to be successful, not based on what they know about the "system" or the best way to "bet," but because of what they know about themselves and their ability to exercise discipline. The average gambler/speculator (that mythical 90%) would be a chronic loser even if they figured out every nuance of the game because they don't have what it takes psychologically to overcome their own self-destructive nature. -- posted by RandeS « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|