|
|
Ask Rande
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 Next » » RandeS - This week's economic numbers (Eastern Time): This week's economic numbers (Eastern Time):Wednesday Thursday Friday (THE 13TH!)*** Retail sales on Thursday and PPI on Friday are high-profile. CPI next Tuesday. -- posted by RandeS » RandeS - The latest "Digital Rules" from Kirk Karlgaard (Forbes Publisher The latest "Digital Rules" from Kirk Karlgaard (Forbes Publisher) is a must read for those interested in bandwidth, molecular processors, and what might be "next." If you're not catching this column in Forbes on a regular basis you're missing one of the brightest writers around.-- posted by RandeS » KirkL - Great Article, Rande Great Article, RandeDo you have a scanner installed in your forehead to get all this good info or do you take the bus/streetcar to work and read a bit each day with the long delays all Willie's building has caused? Speaking of trickle…. Interesting how trickle down seems to be working so well in the great Demo bastion of SanFran. Voodo economics at its best! South of Market is a boom town and now we have news types interviewing people complaining that they are being displaced by those that want to work. News yesterday was on how the building was going to mess up traffic. Back to your article. The productivity increase is amazing. I did some research for someone yesterday on the mutual funds they own so I could make a "sell list" for pruning the dogs and going to VTSMX but taking some time for tax reasons so we sell the worst ones first. Anyway, I was able to do the whole research and recommendations on my PC without having pen touch paper and right from my home office. Just a few short yrs ago, doing this research would have involved a trip to the library and many hours of going through information. I probably would have had to call all 6 funds and had them send their prospectus so I could also look at holdings and objectives. That would have been hours and hours of work, stacks of papers, 6 packets in the mail, etc… The net allowed me to do it in about two hours! The results you can get now are so impressive too. Best part, all this information is available on the net for FREE! Here is something that will make Tony happy. A 200MMX with 4M video is supposed to be fast enough for websurfing. Well, with all the processing I do for the above type of task and how I like to have multiple browsers AND browser windows open to do this sort of research, I am considering an Intel PIII with 12M video just to be more efficient. Also, I often run out of memory with "only" 64Meg so I will look to go to 128M. WinningDayTraders -- posted by KirkL » RandeS - Looks like the 10-year Note auction came in slightly better than Looks like the 10-year Note auction came in slightly better than expected. Anticpated yield was 6.11, came in on average at 6.085. Bid-to-cover wasn't bad at over 2, especially compared to recent 5-year auction. Here's the numbers:10-YEAR NOTES PRICE/ACCEPTANCES -- posted by RandeS » RandeS - Bid-to-cover Ratio This ratio gives an indication of whether demand for bills, notes and bonds under Treasury auction is decent or not. Simply, it's the number of bids received divided by the number of bids accepted. The best way to look at the ratio is to compare it to previous auction and 12-month average ratios for the same issue (level of the "normal" ratio varies, depending on whether you're talking about bills, notes, or bonds). Bottom line -- the higher the bid-to-cover ratio the better because it means there was lots of demand (like an oversubscribed IPO). But, again, it's not the pure number that matters (unless it's really great or really bad) as much as it's measure relative to past auctions of similar maturities.-- posted by RandeS « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|