|
|
Bob Brinker Free Discussion Site 59,820+
This archived discussion is "read only". « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next » » JIMMY62 - Re: Re: If Only Brinker Had... In response to Re: If Only Brinker Had... posted by AL_W:Thanks for the recognition. Bob Brinker is the topic of this thread. My point is that statements such as "Bob went bearish on the market in 2000" are at least a simplification. At worst they mis-represent what happened. On THE PROGRAM Bob routinely allows callers to praise him for their decision to exit the market in 2000. If someone slips through the screener with a critical comment, Bob is not so passive. Just as he was aggressive in policing and then discontinuing the thread on his web site. It would be silly to expect Bob to allow a stream of criticism on communication channels that he controls. Still I am amazed when still another new caller gives Bob praise for the caller’s positive stock market experience while indicating that he did not follow Bob’s advice in detail. -- posted by JIMMY62 » Jeremy75 - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: dija the liar joins the attack Brinker's bulletin was dated March 11, 2003, not 3/19. I've based 90% of my investing with listening to Mr. Brinker's advice since 1986. I don't even care to hear about investing day to day or week to week, boring, as most of the people who talk about the subj. matter). A couple times a mo. I might listen to Brinker. I've only followed his long term advice. I'm just smart, I guess). Dollar cost ave. into index funds, take advantage of 401ks and iras, etc. Got out in Jan. 2000 and back in on 3/12 per 3/11 bulletin. =been able to retire at 45 because of following his long term advice. He's not perfect but has alot of common sense. (Basic Investing should be taught in high school so there would be no need for radio programs like his). Just follow his long term advice, and maybe you won't be so upset.-- posted by Jeremy75 » JIMMY62 - Got out in Jan. 2000 In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: dija the liar joins the attack posted by Jeremy75:Got out in Jan. 2000 You say you were following Brinker's long term advice when you got out in 2000. Bob advised moving 60% of equity holdings from the market into cash in January 2000. Later that year Bob advised moving an additional 5% into cash. Did you follow Bob's long-term advice and make both of these moves? I just ask because you did not mention the second selling of equities in 2000. -- posted by JIMMY62 » pbradford6 - Re: KGO RADIO PRESENTS BOB BRINKER LIVE! In response to KGO RADIO PRESENTS BOB BRINKER LIVE! posted by Kirk:This would be an opportune time to challenge Brinker to come clean on his infamous QQQQ buy and have him explain why he failed to give his subscribers an exit plan. How about it Kirk? Why not provide the host the information and documentation you have acquired about Brinker's track record and his failure to address the damage done to many portfolios? -- posted by pbradford6 » arommel88 - Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up In response to Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up posted by Kirk:
Use as needed. Best used in combination with pointing out another's hypocrisy. Rinse. Repeat. -- posted by arommel88 » Normxxx - Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up In response to Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up posted by Kirk:You think all our hormonally 'improved' athletes might retire? -- posted by Normxxx » arommel88 - Re: Re: Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up In response to Re: Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up posted by Kirk:Luke 10:7
Deut 25:4 You shall not muzzle an ox It is good to note that the ox cannot eat with a muzzel on.
Proverbs 10:4-5 Proverbs 10:26 Proverbs 12:24 Proverbs 12:27 Proverbs 13:4 Proverbs 14:23 Proverbs 15:19
Proverbs 19:15 Proverbs 19:24 Proverbs 20:4 Proverbs 20:13 Proverbs 21:25-26 Proverbs 24:31-34 Proverbs 26:14-15 -- posted by arommel88 » JIMMY62 - Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up In response to Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up posted by arommel88:Nice to have Bob talking about quitting. If and when Bob quits, the controlling reason will not be tax rates. In fact the fact that he is working now is proof that money is not his driver today. He already has much more than he can spend. Bob refuses to work for a higher marginal rate. By Bob's logic he did not do any work for wages until after the first Reagan tax cut. -- posted by JIMMY62 » JIMMY62 - Re: Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up In response to Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up posted by arommel88:I agree with Brinker that raising the cap on Social Security would be a mistake and a disincentive to work. All wage taxes are a disincentive to work for wages. All property taxes are a disincentive to own. Any tax on any activity is a disincentive to do that activity. Why would this proposal be a mistake? -- posted by JIMMY62 » JIMMY62 - Re: Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up In response to Re: Brinker Will Quit Radio Show if Taxes Go Up posted by arommel88:I agree with Brinker that raising the cap on Social Security would be a mistake and a disincentive to work. Bob, have you done the math?
Bob, if you pay more into SSI, you and Mrs. Bob will get a bigger SS checks. Bob, have you done the math? -- posted by JIMMY62 « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 Next » Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|