Learning Style Controversy

In my most recent article, How Do You Learn Best?, the benefit of individual learning styles were discussed. Certainly, many experts, especially Howard Gardiner, firmly believe that tapping into our individual preferences can help us learn better. However, as with most theories, there are detractors.

Steven A. Stahl is one of the most vocal opponents of learning style theory. In a 1999 article, "Different Strokes for Different Folks?", Stahl offers a detailed critique of the entire concept of learning styles, particulary in the field of reading. Why is he so down on learning styles? In short, Stahl believes that:

• Many of the studies supporting learning style theory is not based on reliable study.
• Many people mistake learning preferences with learning styles--and, according to him, there is a big difference.
• People like Howard Gardiner are simply looking for ways to make those with gifts in more creative avenues feel more "intelligent".
• Learning Style theory is used to try to meet the needs of the many, diverse learners in our classrooms.

I agree with Stahl's point that the many of the detailed surveys, tests and inventories that are given to figure out a student's learning style aren't always reliable or objective. They can be too general, awkward and difficult for the students to give an answer that truly reveals any worthwhile information.

Also, as a former teacher, I know that trying to assess learning styles on a large scale is time-consuming and budget-busting (many of the "formal assessments" cost a LOT of money!) The practicality just isn't there more often that not. In my classroom experience, I tried doing various informal assessments with students about various interests, strengths and weaknesses. Whle the information I got back was interesting, I was soon left wondering, "How am I going to apply all of these preferences to my day to day lessons?" Therefore, assessing learning styles on a large scale isn't really practical for most teachers.

My solution to the controversy was to have the students individualize the experience (remember those 3 questions from the article?) The "assessment" wasn't long, it was private which meant students would be honest and it was practical because then the students could apply what they learned about themselves to how they worked and prepared for my class.

Learning styles/preferences aren't a student's savior, rather they are one of many tools students must feel comfortable with in order to build a better study plan for themselves.

I look at it this way: a little self-knowledge never hurt anyone.