|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted by Christina Gleason Jun 17, 2008 |
Last week, I wrote a web site review about the online community at PatientsLikeMe: Online Support for Abuse Victims. Although I have no personal experience with abuse, I am a member of the site because of my Generalized Anxiety Disorder , and I have made acquaintances with a number of people who have suffered various types of abuse.
When I asked people to take a look at the site review, it was brought to my attention that some people dislike the term abuse victim, and instead prefer to identify themselves as abuse survivors.
Do you consider victim and survivor to be interchangeable? Is survivor an attempt to sanitize one's abuse history and make it more politically correct? Or is there a distinction between the two?
I can see making a distinction between past and ongoing abuse. Perhaps someone whose abuse is in the past might identify as an abuse survivor, while someone who is still suffering abuse might identify as an abuse victim. The only problem with that is that people who are being abused may not recognise the behavior as abuse, and therefore abuse victim would only be a label applied to them by other people.
Perhaps it has more to do with a state of mind. Someone who has reconciled their abuse as being in the past, someone who is far along in the healing process may be more likely to call himself or herself an abuse survivor. Someone who has not been able to put their abuse in the past, who may still be experiencing flashbacks, may be more likely to call himself or herself an abuse victim.
I would love to hear feedback concerning this terminology, and I will consider it when writing new articles and editing old ones.