Post this Blog to facebook Add this Blog to del.icio.us! Digg this Blog furl this Blog Add this Blog to Reddit Add this Blog to Technorati Add this Blog to Newsvine Add this Blog to Windows Live Add this Blog to Yahoo Add this Blog to StumbleUpon Add this Blog to BlinkLists Add this Blog to Spurl Add this Blog to Google Add this Blog to Ask Add this Blog to Squidoo

May 12, 2007

Frog Princess haters: get a life!

Looking at the controversy brewing over Disney's animated movie The Princess and the Frog (formerly The Frog Princess), it's obvious that some people have far too much time on their hands.

In case you don't know what I'm talking about, here's a quick recap: Disney's John Lasseter announced the Mouse House's return to cel animation with this movie (currently in pre-production), set in 1920's New Orleans, and featuring the first African-American Disney Princess. From the title, observers quickly deduced that this could be a recreation of the Russian fairy tale, in which a prince accidentally chooses an enchanted frog as his bride.

Given that Disney seems to have finally rediscovered its artistic soul, this should have been a slam-dunk of epic proportions. But nay-sayers quickly leaped out of the woodwork, heaping vitriol on this movie before it even hit production, or before there was even a script.

Designer Shirley Bruno told A-List, "I was shocked to see how carelessly you guys treated Disney's animation film in the making. What the hell! Disney's first Black fairytale and the lead is a Black chambermaid who runs way with a White prince?! There's a villainous Voodoo priest!"

But wait, there was more. Others complained the lead character's name Maddy sounded like a slave's name, or was too close to "Mammy." Others professed to be shocked that the lead character started working as a chambermaid (a job apparently equal to slavery) who ends up in the arms of a handsome white prince, or that the villain was a smooth Voodoo priest called Dr. Duvalier (nice riff on the former Haitian dictator). People even went nuts over the film's title, thinking French people might get insulted.

In a blogospheric tantrum worthy of Courtney Love, BET's Jennifer Daniels sneered the flick was "too-little-too-late" and denounced "a movie like The Frog Princess, with its touching tale of a po' Black chile (sic) being rescued from the Big Black Voodoo Daddy by a great White hope in the pre-Civil Rights Movement South not only offensive and ignorant of history, but highly insensitive as well."

I'm not going to get into her diss of Randy Newman as "the whitest White man to ever rest his head in the Big Easy." Sure, I'd love to see The Meters, the Nevilles or even Quincy Jones in on that score, but I have a suspicion that even Steve Cropper or Dr. John would've been too white for Ms. Daniels.

It's a tasty irony that, in Daniel's haste to be offensive, she managed to be pretty "ignorant of history" herself. Plantation owners in the pre-Civil Rights South? Yep, there were plenty of them around. Poor black children working as chambermaids for imperious whites? Yeah, there were a lot of those as well. Voodoo (or Vodoun) priests who were, well, less than upstanding citizens? Oh yeah. Vodoun, or Obeah or whatever you want to call it, ain't all sweetness and light, people.

Disney's PR department reacted like a whipped dog, saying that everything we knew about the movie was wrong, Maddy was now Tiana and The Frog Princess' new title was The Princess and the Frog. As for the rest of it, the PR department said, "all other characters and aspects of the story will be treated with the greatest respect and sensitivity."

It's not surprising that Disney was feeling a little defensive, especially if they're thinking about reissuing Song of the South on DVD. That 1946 movie has quite the baggage: generations of black people think it's a work of genius, while just as many hope it never sees the light of day. The fact that The Princess and the Frog could be construed as a future Song of the South, before a script is even approved, must be giving the film's writers and producers cat fits.

Animation vet Floyd Norman's reaction was priceless (and yes, before any of you start foaming at the mouth, Norman is black): "Ah, life was so much simpler when we worked on The Jungle Book with Walt. By the way, did you know that Bageerah was a member of the Black Panther Party?"

Disney has a point: don't start judging this flick before a script shows up. In the right light, anything can be construed as offensive to somebody, whether it's Cinderella as offensive to step-parents, Teletubbies insulting Jerry Falwell's delicate sensibilities or Snow White and the Seven Dwarves mocking the vertically-challenged. For Ms. Daniels to claim that The Princess and the Frog will lead to little black girls preferring to play with white dolls when the movie hasn't even reached theatres is beyond ludicrous. And as for "too-little-too-late," I'll respond with "better late than never."

In closing, I quote race-car driver Jacques Villeneuve' statement when Québec's language police objected to Newtown, the name of his Montréal sports bar: "Get a life!"




Comments
Oct 17, 2008 6:34 PM
Guest :
Well said!
Nov 11, 2008 8:01 AM
Guest :
I agree. however I think that they should just cancel the movie if all of these people are going to complain so much. Since there not happy with a REAL Disney princess (starts as a poor underdog and meets a prince that makes her dreams come true i.e. Cinderella, snow white, sleeping beauty). Then maybe they'll shut up if there's just no princess at all. It's what they deserve.
Feb 5, 2009 11:30 AM
Guest :
man just think how all those people at WDAS must FEEL; this must be such A chore on them; an very tired some. to try An make every part of The Princess and the Frog PERFECT FOR THE PC Groups and NAACP Nay Sayers and other sensative people,that find this an that wrong and not right about it.
I agree with Guest - other than put themself through this Hell to make evrything top shape for EVERYONE TO BE HAPPY With; Causing them; the people at WDAS A bunch of Headaches and Emotional Stressmaybe even health problems over this; it's better to just drop this idea all together. if they dont want it in the REAL WAY it was going to be;then have it be nothing then,they get.
Apr 26, 2009 10:36 PM
Guest :
well i think its time to get a black princess and people shouldnt talk bad about this movie wasnt the little mernaid like 16 when she got married to whats his name and the cat in cinderella called lucifer?
May 13, 2009 11:43 AM
Guest :
So the princess starts as a slave, so did Cinderella! And Snow White worked under the Queen as a scullery slave! And guess what, they both found prince chamring and became a princess. ( And for those of you who think that Sleeping Beauty was a slave, she wasn't. She just didn't live in the palace, however she did move back into the palace.)However, I think that the changes that they made are better and besides this is a kids movie!
Jun 7, 2009 10:03 AM
Guest :
walking on strings.
they should have let them write the script first. they have lawyers that inform them of these (non-pc) things.
i never heard any complaints about Unbreakable. how Mr jackson was the arch villian and Mr Willis was the hero. Can't that movie be taken as racial
Jun 29, 2009 8:00 AM
Guest :
I agree 100%. I understand why this film is important since as a black kid in the 1970s, I was inspired by Fat Albert and the Jakcson 5 cartoons. But getting in a tizzy over this is insane. When will people learn the difference between legitimate Black protest and attention-grabbing fools with mircrophones? If anything, these chuckleheads need to protest BET (Booty Entertainment Television) itself for doing FAR more damamge to Black peoples image than this film could ever do!
Sep 7, 2009 2:06 PM
Guest :
What do they want? An african american girl in 1920's Louisiana working as the CEO of a multi-natinal conglomerate? Tha's true to history, right? How do all the black maids out there feel about this scrutiny? Do they think they are slaves? Really? Somebody needs to get a life!!! Maddy sounds like mammy? What? Seriously??????
Nov 23, 2009 12:10 PM
Guest :
This upcoming movie is disgusting, why is Disney responding to the White House 's pressure to brainwash people with multi cultural relationships? What if most Americans are tired to hear about it, especially with all the propaganda on TV since 2008 in commercials, shjows and movies? Isn't there already the message everywhere we need to indoctrinate our kids about this? Why do we need now to show a black prince going with a White princess or vice versa when we never did this? it will definietly irritate most of America which is conservative. Remember America voted Obama to fix the recession (where we see no result) not to promote his interracial agenda. Disney's producers and artists are not even black it looks all too condescendent. Disney wont even call it 'the black princess'. They have to hide the black theme under a frog. How lame , reverse racist and hypocrit
9 Comments