Post this Blog to facebook Add this Blog to del.icio.us! Digg this Blog furl this Blog Add this Blog to Reddit Add this Blog to Technorati Add this Blog to Newsvine Add this Blog to Windows Live Add this Blog to Yahoo Add this Blog to StumbleUpon Add this Blog to BlinkLists Add this Blog to Spurl Add this Blog to Google Add this Blog to Ask Add this Blog to Squidoo

Mar 2, 2007

Living on Credit

Buying carbon credits to offset one's personal carbon dioxide emissions is becoming increasingly popular, with celebrity support from such names as the band Coldplay and former vice-president Al Gore. But are carbon credits really the right way to go?

It turns out that not all carbon offset programs -- planting trees, installing solar panels, and so on -- are created equally. Some are more effective than others in reducing carbon dioxide emissions, some are poorly managed or executed, and some require long periods of time to have any measurable impact. So it seems smart that we not rely on carbon offsets alone to solve our greenhouse gas problems.

However admirable, carbon offsets alone won't compensate for all the carbon dioxide the world produces, and they won't alone help wean our society off of fossil fuels and non-renewables. The only long-term and effective way to permanently reduce greenhouse gas emissions is to move toward a more sustainable, less wasteful way of life. Think of it as the difference between recycling waste and not producing it in the first place, which is always the more environmentally responsible -- and cheaper -- way to go.