Lest we... forgot


© Ralph Zuljan
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

The observance of November 11th as a day to honor the veterans of war began after the First World War. Originally, it was universally called Armistice Day, commenerating the end of World War I on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month of 1918. Since then, the day has been given added significance by giving recognition to the soldiers who have fought and died in all the wars. The name has changed too. In the United States, November 11th is now called Veterans Day. In the British Commonwealth countries, it is called Remembrance Day.

It was inevitable that the meaning of November 11th would change since any enduring relevence of the armistice on which it was based was lost on those that fought in the bloody wars that followed. Propagandists made numerous proclamations about the Great War, perhaps the most ironic was President Wilson's comment this was "the war to end all war." Of course, the high hopes about the ending of World War I were not realized.

Less than twenty years later, the Second World War began and there was no optimism about its consequences. While the protagonists all believed in the need for war, there were no illusions about the cost in blood -- at least, not initially. Even Hitler took note of the silence of the Berlin crowds as their soldiers marched to war. In Britain and France, there was certainly no rejoicing when war was declared.

Participants in World War II did not make express any optimistic expectations about the results of this war at its outbreak, in stark contrast to the prequel. Nonetheless, this war dramatically reduced the number of war-related casualties experienced by the states involved. With something like 50 million dead, Europe and Asia in ruins, perhaps the dramatic decline in warfare ought not to be surprising. Human beings have some sort of collective memory and at the end of the war, the idea of war on this scale became associated with self-destruction. Peace was achieved. And remembering the dead was a tribute to the sacrifices made to reach this end.

John Lewis Gaddis called it the "long peace" and attributed it to the advent of nuclear weapons and the threat of mutally assured destruction. However, Gwin Dyer, in a television documentary and book simply titled War (now out-of-print), noted that there is nothing historically uncommon about the fifty-something years of relative peace that followed the end of World War II. The anomaly is the short time span between the two world wars. Many scholars have noted the connectedness of the world wars. Versailles settled none of the issues raised by World War I; the Second World War settled those issues. At the end of that war the balance of power was very clear. The international institutions constructed on the ruins of war reflected the reality of two new "superpowers" and their relative strength in the community of nations. Nowhere was this more apparent than in the United Nations Security Council. Its permanent members were the United States, the USSR, Great Britain, France and China.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo