How to Tear Your Nation Apart in One Easy Step


© Robert Henderson

Unilingualism is extremely unhealthy in a modern nation-state, and it is curious that some nations are so fascinated by it. Such societies labour under the illusion that they speak only one language, yet there are no historically unilingual nations and very few contemporary ones. Democratic nations either fail to eliminate linguistic diversity and survive, or succeed and die. No need to go far afield to find evidence to support this thesis. My home continent offers three provocative examples of wasted linguistic assets and the irreparable damage done in the process.

Canada

Founded by French adventurers on Algonkian-speaking territory, Canada has been trying to eradicate First Nations' languages from Day One. Two centuries later, English Canadians squandered Canada's political and economic viability failing to do the same to French Canadians. In 1968, having blown 400 years on the unilingual pipe dream, Ottawa recognised French Canadians' right to exist. Canada started the arduous process of repairing centuries of destruction. It's turning out to be hard. Time will tell if twenty generations of resentment and mistrust can be reversed before the Confederation disintegrates. Nevertheless, as the only North American nation to reject the national-language come-on, Canada gets a (half-millenium overdue) A for effort.

The United States

Most anglophone Americans believe their society is and has always been unilingual. Nothing could be further from the truth. English-only America has never existed anywhere but Hollywood. Famous for touting diversity and persecuting nonconformists simultaneously, Americans today are flirting with Cro-Magnon language legislation. Their lack of perception can be startling. I recently lectured an American audience on Canada's constitutional crisis. Afterward, a woman proudly declared, "That's why I belong to English Only. I don't want that to happen here." Apparently she'd slept through my entire presentation. As I had just spent an hour explaining, "English-Only" schemes created Canada's problems.

Facilitating communication has little to do with unilingualism campaigns anywhere. In this case, Americans are stroking their nebulous malaise by chasing imaginary "invaders." As civil-rights supporters became "Communists" in the '50s, so Spanish-speaking Americans are suddenly counted "foreign." Some are arrested by the INS in vast Hispanophone roundups and forcibly "repatriated" to Mexico. Communities around the country, including the state of California, have enacted English-only laws intended at best to insult non-Anglophones. Baser elements wish to exclude them from public life completely.

America's uncivil language war damages its culture, its economy, and its world standing. How much, is a question historians can answer.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article How to Tear Your Nation Apart in One Easy Step in World Languages is owned by . Permission to republish How to Tear Your Nation Apart in One Easy Step in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

13.   Dec 28, 1998 9:20 AM
posed by Pseudoerasmus:

> Author: pseudoerasmus
>
> I don't even understand what the point of the article is. Without
> multingualism, doom? Is that the point? Why should western Canadians,
> ...


-- posted by GeorgeP_6


12.   Dec 21, 1998 4:21 PM
Well, those 5% or so of the Finnish population who are Swedish speakers just might have taken up arms had it not been Finland's policy of two official languages! Anyway, has Finland truly a bilingual ...

-- posted by pseudoerasmus


11.   Dec 21, 1998 3:26 PM
of bi/multilingualism, Alex. Finland, with Swedish as one of the two official languages, immediately springs to mind.

-- posted by GeorgeP_6


10.   Dec 21, 1998 7:52 AM
I don't even understand what the point of the article is. Without multingualism, doom? Is that the point? Why should western Canadians, who have no need or desire to learn French, learn it? Why on ...

-- posted by pseudoerasmus


9.   Dec 21, 1998 12:13 AM
This is the big deal with Québec separation:

1) Québec is the cradle of Canadian civilisation, is essential to the Canadian identity and to Canada's national health. Canadian survival thus far can ...


-- posted by rkhen





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Robert Henderson's World Languages topic, please visit the Discussions page.