|
|
|||
|
|
Page 2
Kimberly A. Wells, Domestic Goddesses Editor, notes: "Domestic fiction has often been criticized as being too narrow....They often had to make the hard choice between family and writing; many of them never married. Those who did marry were often very conflicted about their passion for writing versus their duties as mother;...But they overcame many odds to do so--...When we consider that most of them wrote their stories out longhand, stealing moments while their children were asleep and dinner was cooking -- (Louisa May Alcott even suffered extreme pain from mercury poisoning and had violent had crams from recopying her work)-- and when we consider the beauty and brace of much of their writing, we understand what we missed when these writers were forgotten."
Melton further writes: "Regardless of the innovations in household space that the material feminists promoted, the ideal woman of the middle class was a profoundly private and virtuous creature who supported the moral life of her family while her husband supported the financial and public aspects of family life. But only a prosperous husband could support such a 'domestic goddess.' The industrial revolution sent many poor women and children to a hard life at factories, mills, and other forms of industrial labor. However, it was the middle class who set the standard for nineteenth-century womanhood. Harriet Beecher Stowe's and Catherine Beecher's writings were the epitome of the literary domestic writings of the nineteenth century."
The copyright of the article Household Words and Catherine Beecher- PART THREE - Page 2 in Word Play is owned by Sandra Linville. Permission to republish Household Words and Catherine Beecher- PART THREE - Page 2 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Sandra Linville's Word Play topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
||
|
|
|||