There were systems in place for torturing these women that have no place for discussion in a site that children visit. It is enough to say that many women confessed to a crime they were innocent of committing, often because someone else in a similar position had given their name in the hope of achieving leniency and a quick release from the pain they suffered at the hands of their tormentors. Many people of today could have found themselves in a similar position to the victims back then. Most healers were immediately under suspicion of witchcraft by the very nature of what they did, and the way they did it. Often, a healer who was unable to save someone from a fatal disease would then be accused of witchcraft. Another profession that was largely represented was midwifery, which the Church in particular persecuted.
People, such as Matthew Hopkins in 17th Century England, set themselves up as "witchfinders" and went through various towns seeking out anyone who was hinted to be a witch. For this children were most useful as they often pointed out the people who were different. In England the suspected witches were tried in front of magistrates who took hearsay and innuendo as acceptable evidence from witnesses in order to get a conviction from the supposed witch.
Go To Page: 1 2
| Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: | View all related messages |
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Katie Anne Gustafsson's Women's History topic, please visit the Discussions page.