What's in a Name?


© Cristy Wright

Square or marquis cut, townhouse or colonial, dog or cat - these are only a few of the decisions a woman must make when entering a marriage. More personal and highly controversial still is what she does regarding her own name.

Originally, surnames were invented to solidify inheritance, increase tax revenue and control various ethnic groups. Women had no choice but to adopt their husband's surname, because, according to British and American common law, marriage stripped them of their rights to own property, enter into contracts or sue another party. Approximately 150 years ago, these laws began disappearing, but as late as the 1970's, some states still prohibited women from keeping their birth names after marriage. Fortunately, the legal battles are over, but how many women are actually utilizing this option? According to American Demographics magazine, as late as 1994, ninety percent of women were still adopting their husbands' last name. In fact, only two percent of women were choosing to keep their birth names as their sole surnames, with the other eight percent either hyphenating, using their birth names as a middle name, or some other alternative. So, despite women's pleas of independence, the great majority are still conceding to tradition on this one issue.

The reasons women give vary from "It's not that important to me.", "It'll be easier for the kids if we all have the same name.", "I don't really like my last name.", to "Hyphenated names are so cumbersome." Regardless of the excuse, the fact is, many otherwise strong and autonomous women are choosing to part with a portion of their identity in order to fulfill society's expectation that they procure a husband. A woman I have known since childhood elected to adopt her second husband's name after her first marriage, in which she kept her birth name, ended in divorce. When I inquired about this change in attitude, her response was a simple "I want it to be different this time." Different, I wondered, for who?

As with so many issues regarding the wedding, marriage and subsequent family life, a woman faces many pressures from friends, family, and society at large to follow the path of least resistence, the much trodden road of generations before. The decision to maintain a birth name is not a sign of disrespect to her new in-laws, nor is it a symbol of radical feminist philosophy. It is a way of honoring your spouse and yourself by promising to remain the strong and quirky woman you both love.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article What's in a Name? in Marriage is owned by . Permission to republish What's in a Name? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

13.   Aug 19, 2005 11:17 AM
In response to Last names... posted by Masoko_Tanga:

You are allowed to change your name. As an adult you may change legall ...


-- posted by amo273


12.   Dec 5, 2002 11:37 AM
In response to message posted by Masoko_Tanga:

I have news for you...it IS allowed and you CAN take the woman's name. Start ...


-- posted by krismulder


11.   Jun 15, 2000 10:52 AM
I took advantage of the freedom we women have nowadays re: choosing to retain our father's last name vs. choosing to switch to our husband's last name to separate my professional and personal lives. ...

-- posted by Boutet


10.   May 22, 2000 3:44 PM
In some countries (notably Spain, if I am understanding an exchange student properly), children get their mother's last names, not their father's.

I think it is all fine and dandy to call something ...


-- posted by erbain


9.   May 21, 2000 12:46 PM
Historically, marriage was a result of pragmatic concerns, such as political alliances, wealth or property, and had absolutely no connection to emotion or romantic love at all. Women were considered p ...

-- posted by CristyWF





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Cristy Wright 's Marriage topic, please visit the Discussions page.