Antidepressants--Not a Science


© Sharon L. Cohen
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

For 20 years, antidepressants have given some if not entire relief to countless individuals. The word "some" or partial is used here since about 70 percent of people are improved. That leaves another 30 percent (a significant number) who are only getting partial or no help from this medicine: a.k.a. "the treatment resistant group."

That's one good reason why the search for new antidepressants continues.

Another reason for the hunt for new antidepressants is side effects-it can be a trade off of whether or not to deal with the depression, weight gain, sex problems and insomnia, to name a few. Thus, one explanation for recurrent depression: People decide the side effects aren't worth the problem.

Recurrent depression occurs for other reasons as well. In a 1998 study, more than one-third (37 percent) of people treated for depression by primary care physicians suffered recurrent depression within 19 months. Seattle researchers followed 370 adults treated for depression by a large HMO in the Puget Sound area. Relapse was defined as suffering two weeks or more of significantly depressed mood and other symptoms of depression (sleep and appetite changes, lethargy, hopelessness, suicidal thoughts) from seven to 19 months after initial treatment.

The biggest risk factor for relapse was a previous relapse. In quite a few people, depression is a chronic recurring illness characterized by periods of normal moods and major depression. The other risk factor for relapse was low-level depressive symptoms despite treatment, notably, sadness. Compared with participants who did not relapse, those who had relapsed previously and reported sadness despite treatment were three times more likely to relapse again.

The simple truth is that antidepressants are not a science. No one can say, "Oh, you are in mental pain," take two of these SSRIs and a nap and you'll be fine again. If it were so easy! Researchers are learning as they go. And in the majority of times, they get it right, if the percentages are correct. The results with Prozac are a good example. Many a person will praise this medication. And for those whom it has helped, it's a godsend.

However, there's another side to this issue as well. An article in May 2000 Boston Globe reports, "Just as the 14-year patent on Prozac is about to expire and the drug's maker, Eli Lilly and Co., is preparing to launch a new version, a body of evidence has come to light revealing the antidepressant's dark side. The company's internal documents...indicate that the pharmaceutical giant has known for years that its best-selling drug could cause suicidal reactions in a small but significant number of patients."

Go To Page: 1 2 3


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

1.   Aug 21, 2000 8:47 PM
Thanks. As I have told many, I am a continuing depression sufferer. I've been on medication since 1994, but have to change all the time. Hope they do find better drugs as time goes on.

Jerri ...


-- posted by jerrib





Join the latest discussions

For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Sharon L. Cohen's Depression in Women topic, please visit the Discussions page.