Improving cargo security: the technology is here, but where's the urgency? - Page 2


© Alan Kotok
Page 2
However, as the report notes, there are no security standards for shipping containers. The only semblance of security is a 50-cent numbered seal made of lead. And because containers are built for shipping and not for storage - transportation companies coordinate truck and rail shipping schedules to prevent the need for storage - many ports do not have a lot of space to store containers once they arrive.

Serious immediate and lasting effects

As the report indicates, a nuclear device or chemical/biological weapon detonated in a shipping container at an American port would not only be an immediate catastrophe, it could severely interrupt economic activity for months thereafter. An attack of this kind would require immediate inspection of containers at other U.S. ports and in ships unloading at or approaching U.S. ports. Major trans-shipment ports such as Rotterdam or Singapore would soon become backed-up affecting ocean shipments worldwide.

The CFR task force issues several recommendations to improve security of surface cargoes entering the U.S:

-- An integrated approach to security covering the entire logistics and transportation network, rather than reacting to known vulnerabilities at individual ports of entry

-- Security standards at inter-modal loading facilities, including certification of compliance with the standards backed up by independent audits

-- Identification and demonstration projects of off-the-shelf sensing equipment to track container movements

-- Improvement in the timing and accuracy of data about the contents, location, and accountability of container movements

Automatic identification technology readily available

The task of tracking and inspecting cargoes seems daunting and it would by no means be easy. However, the protocols and technology for identifying containers and their contents are well established and have existed for some time. In fact, these technologies are employed in many of the industries, such as retail distribution, and manufacturing making extensive use of the transportation networks.

Tracking containers and cargoes requires separately identifying (1) the container and (2) the cargoes, and (3) connecting the cargo identifiers to the container. Right now, the only security-related identifier is the seal number on the container, which applies only to the one-time shipment. For any shipping container to be loaded on a vessel, it should also have a unique identifier assigned by an international authoritative body. There are many precedents for identifying and tracking assets in this way, including the Vehicle Identification Number found in automobiles, assigned by the manufacturers. A similar kind of identifier can be assigned by container manufacturers.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5


The copyright of the article Improving cargo security: the technology is here, but where's the urgency? - Page 2 in Technology & U.S. Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Improving cargo security: the technology is here, but where's the urgency? - Page 2 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo