|
|||
|
If minimum wage workers had experienced the same percentage pay increases from 1980
to 1995 as America's CEOs, they would earn $39,000 annually.
Persons earning twice the minimum wage would have to work 497 years to earn what Michael Eisner of Disney made in 1997 alone. (That doesn't count Michael's nearly $600 million in unexercised stock options.) While CEO pay increased 54% from 1995-1996, their companies' profits rose only 11% and factory workers saw a paltry 3% increase in pay. These are just a few of the disgraceful facts about executive pay in America and are descriptive of the widening gap between haves and have-nots. Though peaks and valleys of income disparity have somewhat leveled at times, e.g. the post-WW II era, we're back on the roller coaster and the ride is wilder than ever. America's wealthiest fifth outearns the bottom fifth by 11:1 - among the highest in developed nations. In Japan it's only 4:1, in Great Britain, 7:1. Specific to CEO versus worker pay, that ratio is now 212:1, up from 44:1 in 1965. Without brakes being applied, the roller coaster is headed for a humdinger collision with mass discontent. So you don't think Mr. Eisner and his $10,653,820 income are being used here as an atypical example of wealth concentration and executive-pay mania, what follows is 1997 information on several other executives extracted at random from "Executive PayWatch" - watchdog of America's S&P 500. This sampling readily produced a less-than-subtle trend of trickle-up. GTE Corporation's Charles Lee scooped up income of $5,295,571, and that's not counting last year's $7,602,188 in stock options or the $20,742,420 in previously unexercised options. Mr. Lee, I was once a business customer of yours in another state, and you were unable to dispatch a phone man on the week promised, let alone the day. And for this you're getting $33,640,179? Well, ring-a-ding-ding. At Philip Morris, Geoffrey Bible made a kool $9,723,755. His stock options total $84,396,322. Obstruction of justice might land you or me in the slammer, but it helped put Geoffrey on easy street. GE's board of directors brought a lot of good things to Jack Welch's life when it paid him $8,800,797. Seeing that less than $10 million a year is tough for a family man to get by on, it threw in another $18,783,000 in stock options. After all, he only had $182,243,818 in unexercised options from previous years. Candyman Kenneth Wolfe of Hershey Foods was among the low-income losers, taking in only $3,213,390 and a mere $1,329,326 in stock options. Come on, Hershey, how can you expect motivation and productivity from your people when you pay them peanuts like that?
The copyright of the article To Have and Have Not in U.S. Politics is owned by . Permission to republish To Have and Have Not in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Phil Carpenter's U.S. Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||