The Rights of the Colonists - Page 4


© Brian Tubbs
Page 4

Here is the key to the position of Otis and the ultimately prevailing stance of revolutionary America. God gives people their fundamental rights, including the right to property. Knowing the limitations and weaknesses of Man, God ordained government to protect the civil rights of freeborn men and women. The "administrators of [that government] were originally the whole people; that they might have devolved it on whom they pleased." Within that context, any rightful or valid government is accountable to the people and achieves its authority via the consent of its subjects. In order to have that consent and to achieve its just ends, government must be close to the people. It must be representative of the people over which it governs. Parliament fails that basic test. Further, "that by [the English Constitution] every man in the dominions is a free man; that no parts of His Majesty's dominions can be taxed without their consent; that every part has a right to be represented in the supreme or some subordinate legislature; that the refusal of this would seem to be a contradiction in practice to the theory of the constitution." He concludes that a renewed acknowledgement of and commitment to these fundamental principles of government and British common law would "firmly unite all parts of the British empire in the greater peace and prosperity, and render it invulnerable and perpetual."

Agree with him or not, James Otis was not driven to these words by greed or power. He was cause-motivated. Having gone through the exhaustive process of developing a personalized, yet sound legal philosophy steeped in English common law tradition, Otis was guided by an enthusiasm for what he believed in. His was a sincere commitment to the fundamental and constitutional rights of the colonists as full-fledged British subjects. Because of that burning passion, James Otis is the man most responsible for energizing the colonists in their resistance to British imperial authority and laying the groundwork for massive resistance to parliamentary taxation.

Our next article will focus in depth on the Stamp Act, and introduce two other hugely influential leaders of the colonial protest movement: Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry.

****************

Selected bibliography:

Morgan, Edmund S., The Challenge of the American Revolution

Otis, James, The Rights of the British Colonists Asserted and Proved*

*Read the full text of Rights at the following web site:

http://occ.awlonline.com/bookbind/pubboo...

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article The Rights of the Colonists - Page 4 in American Revolution is owned by . Permission to republish The Rights of the Colonists - Page 4 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

5.   Jun 20, 2000 9:05 PM
My first article on the origins of the war - titled "No Taxation Without Representation" - touched briefly on the British point of view of the war as well as that of modern American critics of the col ...

-- posted by BrianTubbs


4.   Jun 20, 2000 1:46 PM
It would be interesting to read the legal opinions
of the pro-British on these documents. Somebody
must have written refutations of them.

Those of us who are relatively ignorant of history
of l ...


-- posted by Prometheus


3.   Jun 20, 2000 10:18 AM
I like your attention to detail. I also like the way you bring up *all* sides of a question when dealing w/ your analysis. And, you don't go off on needless tangents.

So, in my opinion, keep do ...


-- posted by DollChique


2.   Jun 20, 2000 8:36 AM
There can NEVER be too much detail in historical articles!

-- posted by Marella


1.   Jun 20, 2000 7:52 AM
What have you all thought about these last few articles on the origins of the American Revolution? Am I going into too much detail? Do you agree/disagree with the analysis? What are your thoughts o ...

-- posted by BrianTubbs





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Brian Tubbs's American Revolution topic, please visit the Discussions page.