It is into this complex web of emotion, intrigue, and old-fashioned value systems that historian Thomas J. Fleming plunges in his 1999 look at the "affair of honor" which claimed the life of Alexander Hamilton. Of course, Fleming gives the reader more than a study in the 18th century culture and ethics of dueling. In the words of the book's dust jacket, Fleming examines the "post-revolutionary world of 1804, a chaotic and fragile time in the young country as well as a time of tremendous global instability."
According to Amazon.com reviewer Gregory McNamee, we often see the "revolutionary founders [as being] equipped with wings and haloes." McNamee points out, "They were anything but saintly, however; their behavior, public and private, was often scandalous." When you insert this "scandalous" behavior and the often unchecked ambitions of some of the more colorful figures during such a fragile and chaotic time period, you have the makings for some serious trouble. And that is exactly what happened.
Ostracized by the Democratic-Republican Party for his refusal to step aside when he tied Thomas Jefferson in the 1800 Electoral College, Vice President Aaron Burr left national government in 1804 to return to his native New York. There, he tried to put together a coalition of Republicans and Federalists to become governor. Standing in his way was Alexander Hamilton, feverishly sending out letters to friends and supporters, urging them to oppose Burr's efforts at all costs. Since Hamilton had been partly to blame for Burr's failure to capture the presidency in 1800, this was simply too much for Burr to stomach. A tense back-and-forth between Hamilton and Burr, initiated by the latter, soon led to the most famous one-on-one confrontation in American history.
Go To Page: 1 2