Home » Reading & Literature » J.R.R. Tolkien » Love in the Trees

Love in the Trees

© Michael Martinez

Tom Bombadil and the Ents have buried themselves in little niches and it seems there is no digging them up for new discussion. We should try to change that. The most common question asked about Bombadil is, "Why didn't the Ring affect him?" In reality, that question should be, "Why didn't Bombadil want the Ring." There is a difference. I believe the Ring did affect old Tom, at least to the extent that it roused his curiosity and drew his interest long enough that he had to satisfy himself regarding whether he was still his own master. As for the Ents, about all anyone ever asks is, "Did the Ents find the Entwives?" And it should be noted that Tolkien provided answers for both questions. His readers were so intrigued by Bombadil and the Ents that they inquired about these matters more than once. And yet, I've now come to realize that we have all missed something important concerning both Bombadil and the Ents. I think that, perhaps, even Tolkien himself missed it. In discussing the symbolic importance of Bombadil, Tolkien wrote to Naomi Mitcheson in Letter 144:

Bombadil is not an important person -- to the narrative. I suppose he has some importance as a 'comment'. I mean, I do not really write like that: he is just an invention (who first appeared in the Oxford Magazine about 1933), and he represents something that I feel important, though I would not be prepared to analyze the feeling precisely. I would not, however, have left him in, if he did not have some kind of function. I might put it this way. The story is cast in terms of a good side, and a bad side, beauty against ruthless ugliness, tyranny against kingship, moderated freedom with consent against compulsion that has long lost any object save mere power, and so on; but both sides in some degree, conservative or destructive, want a measure of control. But if you have, as it were taken 'a vow of poverty', renounced control, and take your delight in things for themselves without reference to yourself, watching, observing, and to some extent knowing, then the question of the rights and wrongs of power and control might become utterly meaningless to you, and the means of power quite valueless. It is a natural pacifist view, which always arises in the mind when there is a war. But the view of Rivendell seems to be that it is an excellent thing to have represented, but that there are in fact things with which it cannot cope; and upon which its existence nonetheless depends. Ultimately only the victory of the West will allow Bombadil to continue, or even to survive. Nothing would be left for him in the world of Sauron.

The copyright of the article Love in the Trees in J.R.R. Tolkien is owned by Michael Martinez. Permission to republish Love in the Trees in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.