Who's Afraid of the Big, Bad Purists? - Page 7


© Michael Martinez
Page 7
Peter, you nailed that scene. And even if you didn't have Ian McKellen and Ian Holm's fantastic performances to lay down what is virtually the backbone of this first movie, I think most audiences will come out of the theater with the Viggo/Sean scene so strongly impressed in their thoughts they will feel they have been well-served. And finally, I have to reiterate my complaint about the smoking. It was completely uncalled-for. There is no justification for depicting characters using tobacco in the movies. The affectation was something that Tolkien had no idea was so deadly and dangerous. It is not fair to his audience to endanger future lives by portraying tobacco use as a harmless passtime. The movie is enjoyable, but if the tobacco use is in there to placate people's puristic desires, it was not necessary. It adds nothing to the storyline and the characterizations are not dependent upon it. People die from using tobacco products. People suffer greivous harm from using tobacco products. Hollywood needs to understand that it has a responsibility to its audience not to glorify behaviors which are now known to be deadly. We didn't see any Hobbits drinking rat-poison or standing in front of freight-trains. No Hobbits put guns to their heads and blew themselves away. We don't need to see Hobbits, Wizards, and Rangers smoking. I know that I will be attacked and criticized for taking this stand. But I'm just someone who regards human life to be more important than a misguided attempt to be faithful to a book when making a movie. So, I hope people enjoy the movie. I look forward to seeing it again. But I am saddened to see that such an irresponsible decision was made on a very important issue. For the movie overall, Peter, you get a "Well done". For the tobacco, you get a "shame on you". Cancer is no laughing matter. I hope you never lose any relatives to it. I've lost way too many.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


The copyright of the article Who's Afraid of the Big, Bad Purists? - Page 7 in J.R.R. Tolkien is owned by Michael Martinez. Permission to republish Who's Afraid of the Big, Bad Purists? - Page 7 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

39.   Aug 25, 2002 12:54 PM
In response to message posted by Aerlinnel:

The origins of Tolkien's Orcs are a convoluted subject, with no real clear decisions on his ...


-- posted by Michael_Martinez


38.   Aug 24, 2002 2:04 PM
Well, it is true that the movie has inspired quite masses of fanon that have no actual grounding in the books themselves (e.g. the idea that Legolas is exactly 2931 at the time of the WotR - a made-up ...

-- posted by Aerlinnel


37.   Aug 22, 2002 2:49 PM
In response to message posted by fudgepuppy_kid:

The movie has established its own history, and neither you nor anyone else should be c ...


-- posted by Michael_Martinez


36.   Aug 21, 2002 5:38 AM
In the movie, there was this scene when Saruman was talking to an Uruk (I think) and (correct me if I'm wrong bcos the last time I saw the movie was like 8 months ago) there was this thing that he sai ...

-- posted by fudgepuppy_kid


35.   Jun 26, 2002 2:53 PM
In response to message posted by Laurelin70:

It's my understanding that the European Union is about to take on the American tobacco com ...


-- posted by Michael_Martinez





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Michael Martinez's J.R.R. Tolkien topic, please visit the Discussions page.