A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Canon - Page 3


© Michael Martinez
Page 3
Confused? Now you know why I don't try to define canons. Well, okay, I define them all the time. I wear them like disposable wrist-watches. I use them until the batteries run dry and then discard them. The canons I use today may look like the ones I used yesterday, but they are really different in some subtle, obscure fashion. The real canon, the underlying core story (which seems to have changed relatively little after Tolkien abandoned The Book of Lost Tales), was an evolving, growing story about an imaginary past. A historical period which never was. This historical period included the rise and fall of a great Elven civilization. The Elves have moved on, but we remember them, vaguely, and Tolkien's canon was an attempt to formalize that memory. The problem is, he never really succeeded in putting that canon down on paper. Tolkien recorded a myriad of ideas and conflicting details and incidents. If we take them all together, we get a morass of unbelievably confused images and nits to pick. So we are forced by the differences and contradictions to pick and choose our sources. But mixing and matching sources from 1917 and 1970 is not reasonable. Galadriel doesn't even exist in 1917's stories, and The Book of Lost Tales had long been abandoned by the time Tolkien was winding down his musings near the end of his life. If one gets the impression that he was probably terribly depressed by the prospect of fixing up the whole thing, one might not be far from the truth. Sorting through all the traditional attempts to document the histories is a real chore. Heck, it used to put me to sleep until my body built up some immunity to the somnolent texts. The Internet only exacerbates the situation. The Law of Mandos stipulates that, whenever Turin or Morgoth become the focus of discussion, someone will inevitably drag in the "Second Prophecy of Mandos". This little gem has no relevance to The Lord of the Rings, but is frequently cited as proof that Morgoth will return at the end of Time, and that Turin will slay him. The inconvenient fact that Tolkien abandoned the prophecy in the 1930s, and ultimately only considered restoring it in a substantially different form (due to Andreth, an Edainic woman of Beleriand, whose prophecy foretells of Turin's temporary return at the end of the First Age), is either unknown to the faithful or disputed in some fashion.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


The copyright of the article A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Canon - Page 3 in J.R.R. Tolkien is owned by Michael Martinez. Permission to republish A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Canon - Page 3 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

11.   Feb 17, 2003 8:06 PM
In response to message posted by lindil:

Daunting work, but great. ...


-- posted by BandwagonNewbie


10.   Feb 15, 2003 7:41 AM
In response to message posted by Michael_Martinez:

Greetings Michael!

I thought I would give you a bit of an upddate on our Silm pro ...


-- posted by lindil


9.   Feb 12, 2003 8:41 PM
In response to message posted by Pervertedhobbit:

What matters to one person is inconsequential to another. I try to help with the que ...


-- posted by Michael_Martinez


8.   Feb 12, 2003 12:55 PM
What is really important about the canons? I mean, take the Balrog debate. Do they have wings, or don't they? Isn't it enough to know that one of them wiped out a thriving community of dwarves, and ar ...

-- posted by Pervertedhobbit


7.   Mar 27, 2001 5:29 PM
In response to message posted by themightywizard:

No. "Canon" is hardly limited to religious texts.


-- posted by Michael_Martinez





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Michael Martinez's J.R.R. Tolkien topic, please visit the Discussions page.