If I only had a Bombadil...


© Michael Martinez
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic
Page 8
But Bombadil is important in other ways as well. It is Bombadil who shows that the Ring cannot master everyone, and if it cannot master everyone then there is reason to hope that Frodo can withstand its influence for at least a while. He has to struggle with the Ring more and more as he gets closer to Mordor, but the Ring only wins in the final struggle, as Frodo stands before Sammath Naur. Even so, when Frodo succumbs to the Ring's influence in Bree and at Weathertop the reader is reminded that Frodo, too, has his limits. He is not as powerful as Bombadil, not as sure of himself as Bombadil. Bombadil is a catalyst who sets up the conflict between Frodo and the Ring in a way that Gandalf cannot. Gandalf is himself afraid of the Ring. Tom isn't. The step from Buckland to Bree may seem rather simple, but in terms of advancing the story Bombadil provides the means for Frodo to sidestep the net which has been laid for him. The full scope of the search for the Ring is only made apparent in Unfinished Tales, where we are told that the Lord of the Nazgul is responsible for waking the Willow and arousing the Barrow-wights. Recall that when Tom first meets the Hobbits he is surprised to learn that the Willow is awake and active. "You let them out again, Old Man Willow! What be you a-thinking-of? You should not be waking. Eat earth! Dig deep! Drink water! Go to sleep! Bombadil is talking!" The Willow and Wight are important to the plot because they help underscore just how perilous Frodo's escape from the Shire really is. He is no longer safe anywhere, as Gildor points out. The Nazgul have found his home in Hobbiton, they are tracking him through the Shire, and they are on horseback. How are four Hobbits supposed to outrun four Nazgul on horseback? They can't. So getting the Hobbits from the Shire to Bree forces a hard choice upon the screenwriters. The escape has to be acceptable, and it can't drag on. The most oft-cited reason for not including Bombadil in the movie is that there simply isn't time to include everything. Quite true. Yet if Bombadil is dropped that means that the plot has to be altered, or else a gap left in the storyline. At one point Peter Jackson suggested perhaps he would leave in the gap, and just have the Hobbits scoot out of the Shire and show up at Bree. The audience would be free to infer whatever they wished about that. I've always liked this approach. And it would gel nicely with added scenes on a DvD that take up the slack.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

9.   Aug 13, 2003 8:56 AM
In response to message posted by lawnboy101:

Hear! Hear! I whole-heartedly agree. Jackson's intent was to make a great film from a gre ...


-- posted by palandiliar


8.   Aug 12, 2003 7:12 PM
I must first admit to being a latecomer to middle-earth. I must then confess to having seen "fellowship" (both the original and the extended)at least 20 times. I viewed "towers" twice in theatre. I've ...

-- posted by lawnboy101


7.   Apr 11, 2002 7:10 PM
In response to message posted by BandwagonNewbie:

One can only speculate, but Tolkien seems to have felt that Bombadil was so committed ...


-- posted by Michael_Martinez


6.   Apr 10, 2002 7:10 PM
Do we have enough information to rule out the possibility that the Ring, in the long run, would have corrupted Bombadil had it stayed with him? ...

-- posted by BandwagonNewbie


5.   Jun 11, 2001 10:49 AM
There are only 3 films to cover six books, which is how Tolkien broke it down. The entire first book (getting Frodo to Rivendell)is (to my mind)an extended introduction to the hobbits and a metaphor/f ...

-- posted by desertblue





Join the latest discussions

For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Michael Martinez's J.R.R. Tolkien topic, please visit the Discussions page.