Suite101

If I only had a Bombadil... - Page 10


© Michael Martinez
Page 10
For about 23 years I wondered what the heck that line was referring to. And then I bought the fiftieth anniversary commemorative video. Mamma mia! What fantastic footage was revealed on that tape. And, sadly, the notes which accompanied the tape revealed that other scenes had been filmed and lost. The Jitterbug sequence only survives because the choreographer made a home movie of it (fortunately, he used color film). So, you not only get to see Judy Garland, Ray Bolger, Burt Lahr, and Jack Haley doing the Jitterbug, you also see one of the tree operators (yes, the Jitter Trees in the Haunted Forest had people inside them) coming out for a breath of fresh air. Sadly, we never actually get to see the Jitterbug, although it was there in the original movie as an animated pink and blue insect. And the dance number required five months of rehearsals and filming. The deletion of this scene was a crime against all film-making. "The Wizard of Oz" is a great movie, and one of my all-time favorites. It's almost nothing like the book. Well, there's a tornado, and Toto too. People can enjoy both the book and the movie (I loved the book when I read it). Or not. But we can also hope the "Lord of the Rings" DvD collection offers at least as much extra magic as the Wizard's 50th anniversary video. Because, you know, Bombadil is important to the story no matter how much it gets changed. He is.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


The copyright of the article If I only had a Bombadil... - Page 10 in J.R.R. Tolkien is owned by Douglas Charles Rapier. Permission to republish If I only had a Bombadil... - Page 10 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

9.   Aug 13, 2003 8:56 AM
In response to message posted by lawnboy101:

Hear! Hear! I whole-heartedly agree. Jackson's intent was to make a great film from a gre ...


-- posted by palandiliar


8.   Aug 12, 2003 7:12 PM
I must first admit to being a latecomer to middle-earth. I must then confess to having seen "fellowship" (both the original and the extended)at least 20 times. I viewed "towers" twice in theatre. I've ...

-- posted by lawnboy101


7.   Apr 11, 2002 7:10 PM
In response to message posted by BandwagonNewbie:

One can only speculate, but Tolkien seems to have felt that Bombadil was so committed ...


-- posted by Michael_Martinez


6.   Apr 10, 2002 7:10 PM
Do we have enough information to rule out the possibility that the Ring, in the long run, would have corrupted Bombadil had it stayed with him? ...

-- posted by BandwagonNewbie


5.   Jun 11, 2001 10:49 AM
There are only 3 films to cover six books, which is how Tolkien broke it down. The entire first book (getting Frodo to Rivendell)is (to my mind)an extended introduction to the hobbits and a metaphor/f ...

-- posted by desertblue





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Michael Martinez's J.R.R. Tolkien topic, please visit the Discussions page.