Downloads and Dragons: Look what they've done to Fantasy, ma - Page 5


© Michael Martinez
Page 5
Of course, as the Vulcans might say, only Tolkien can write The Lord of the Rings...or recite it. But then, very good Shakespearean actors can take Elizabethan English and make it sound like they speak it in their sleep, while the rest of us break the sentences down into fumbling half-delivered cliches straight out of drunken Bible readings. Most people just don't know how to talk like that. But will it spoil the moment if Aragorn walks past a real wall from some 100-year-old ruin in New Zealand, or if Merry says, "Woudn't that put a nice twist on things?" The chief difference between a "Dungeons and Dragons" adventure and The Lord of the Rings is that the players live the adventure as it plays out but only Tolkien can write The Lord of the Rings. LOTR wanders all over the map but it does so with a purpose. Frodo's adventure lies before him, mapped out if cloaked in mystery. Aragorn's journey is more uncertain. He bounces all over Rohan like a tennis ball in a wayward match, and about all he accomplishes is teaching the Rohirrim how to say the name of his sword. Aragorn doesn't began to take on real purpose until he gets hold of the palantir. By this point he is free to make his own decisions and strike out on his own. The point of a well-coordinated adventure game (and they can easily become uncoordinated) is to drive the characters toward a common goal. That goal can be as simple as killing a vampire, looting a relatively empty dungeon, or saving the world. I like the save-the-world games myself, but I've played in some that were pretty tense and involved nothing more than getting the characters out of a trap (these were tournament games, of course). Anyone writing a "Dungeons and Dragons" movie could have gone either way. The plot for the first DnD movie (yes, there are supposed to be two more) is a pretty good adventure story with a serious goal, a complex villainous plot (people have to be swayed -- it's not simply a dark lord controlling legions of storm troopers versus some heroic fighter, as in "Masters of the Universe"). Nonetheless, a fantasy adventure is uncontrollable. There is nothing to prevent the players from naming their characters after soft-drinks and kicking in every door they find. You can't tell the players that defacing an altar in a temple is going to go unnoticed. Well, you can, but they may stop playing under you. You have to let some random die rolls determine how things go. And those dice might bring the cavalry rumbling over the horizon or a stampeding herd of dinosaurs. Worse, the cavalry troops might be riding some very hungry carnivorous dinosaurs. Are they friend or foe?

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8


The copyright of the article Downloads and Dragons: Look what they've done to Fantasy, ma - Page 5 in J.R.R. Tolkien is owned by Michael Martinez. Permission to republish Downloads and Dragons: Look what they've done to Fantasy, ma - Page 5 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

13.   Feb 3, 2003 5:06 AM
In response to message posted by BandwagonNewbie:

What about "Legend", Book 1 of the Drenai Tales by David Gemmell.
Feels a lot like t ...


-- posted by wolbo


12.   Jan 24, 2003 10:33 PM
Stephen King's "Eyes of the Dragon"
Raymond Feist's "Faerie Tale"
Both of these are good single-volume fantasy tales that could work well on film. ...

-- posted by Mataxes


11.   Jan 24, 2003 10:30 PM
In response to message posted by BandwagonNewbie:

That's really a tough call. One of the biggest problems I see with many "Hollywood" f ...


-- posted by Mataxes


10.   Jan 22, 2003 9:05 PM
What other books from the fantasy genre would make for plausible movie adaptations?

-- posted by BandwagonNewbie


9.   Dec 15, 2000 8:35 AM
In response to message posted by Aelric:

Aelric, "Dungeons and Dragons" is a good movie. "Excalibur" is simply awful. It's just THAT ...


-- posted by Michael_Martinez





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Michael Martinez's J.R.R. Tolkien topic, please visit the Discussions page.