Suite101

To Be a Jedi


© Paul F. McDonald

Let us begin this four part essay with an old Zen story that is still good.

There was once a renowned master, and as he walked among his students who were scattered about him, all seated in deep contemplation, he called out one particular student's name. The student immediately responded to it, and the master himself responded by instantly walking over to him and administering a swift kick. A few moments passed, and the master again called out his name. The student likewise responded to it, and the master likewise gave him another kick. This went on for the entire session. At the end, the master came over to the student and said, "I apologize for kicking you, but it should be you who apologizes to me."

This is as good a way as any to bring to the forefront the central question of this piece, which revolves around a certain crisis of identity. It was wonderfully played out in Attack of the Clones, and so the question can be framed in that particular context. How should a Jedi identify their self - by their own name, ego, or even status as a padawan or master, or solely by their immersion into the impersonal ground of being that is the Force?

The Jedi themselves seem to have various answers to this dilemma, but in the prequels, most of this conflict centers around Anakin Skywalker. In The Phantom Menace, we see that he comes from outside the Order, and therefore has a very strong personality, as well as attachment to his name. Even as he dreams of being a Jedi. And in Attack of the Clones, the main driving tension of the story is between Anakin's higher duties as a Jedi and his personal attachment to Padme Amidala.

Life can been seen as almost two different stories, albeit two different stories that play out simultaneously. The Japanese Zen philosopher D.T. Suzuki exported much Eastern wisdom to the West, and he once commented that in a very general way, the latter was more focused on an "elaboration of particulars," whereas the former came at the world from an "intuitive grasp of the whole." These two modes of valid experience also invoked the interest of the renowned mythologist Joseph Campbell. In one of his own marvelous essays on "Zen," he took the Japanese terms for them, defining "ji hokkai" as the particular "universe of things," and "ri hokkai" as the "absolute universe," each of which describe the two stories simultaneously unfolding.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article To Be a Jedi in Star Wars is owned by Paul F. McDonald. Permission to republish To Be a Jedi in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

3.   Oct 15, 2002 12:10 PM
In response to message posted by Dedalus47:

I never thought of it as a Hamlet sort of definition, but I do think you are right. I ha ...


-- posted by JediJinSu


2.   Oct 8, 2002 2:46 PM
In response to message posted by JediJinSu:

Thank you. I would say that is sort of the Hamlet interpretation. I haven't quite said al ...


-- posted by Dedalus47


1.   Oct 4, 2002 12:56 PM
I have been having the discussion on the becoming one with the universe idea on another discussion forum I am on. While they become one with the force, they retain their individuality as long as that ...

-- posted by JediJinSu





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Paul F. McDonald's Star Wars topic, please visit the Discussions page.