The Trial of Pete Rose© Roy Pickering
Jan 23, 2003
Should Pete Rose be made eligible for induction into Major League Baseball's Hall of Fame? This is a thorny question to grapple with, and one that won't go away easily. At least not so long as Charlie Hustle is alive and kicking and reminding us that he just may have been the greatest ever to play the game. Professional baseball is plagued by numerous problems. Compared to the surge in popularity of the NFL and the NBA, baseball is going through troubled times. Had the players' union gone on strike this past season, it may have been enough to cripple the sport for good. That disaster was narrowly averted. But how far away is the next crisis, and will it be the storm that baseball cannot weather? Major League Baseball needs to do something to demonstrate its strength and assert its position as the great American pastime. The woes of the league are symbolized by the fact that its all-time career leader in hits happens to be shunned by the institution that celebrates the best ever to play. As long as this situation remains, there will seem to be something wrong about baseball, something missing from its grandeur. But should the situation be remedied, a bandage applied to the sport's wounds, if the situation is a just one? This is the dilemma that has been faced ever since Pete Rose's banishment for gambling by then commissioner Bart Giamatti, and it is likely to resurface time and time again until resolved for good.
There is little doubt that Pete Rose did gamble on professional baseball games, including those played by the team he happened to be managing. Supposedly he only bet on his own team to win, which many point to as a factor in his favor. After all, if he was throwing games that he played in or managed, the case would be overwhelmingly open and shut. Not even the most diehard supporter of Rose would claim that even though he engineered his teams to lose games in order to make money for himself, he still deserves to be enshrined based solely on his statistics. Betting against himself is what "Shoeless" Joe Jackson allegedly did along with his teammates in the Word Series many moons ago. Despite Jackson's protestations and numbers indicating he was in fact doing all he could to win, the shoeless one remains outside the pantheon of the immortals. This is an accepted state of affairs by baseball enthusiasts, no matter how many movies are made that cast a flattering light on Jackson.
Go To Page:
1
2
3
In response to message posted by NYCScribe:
Maybe "Mr. Hustle" will make it into the gambler's hall of fame..... <img src="htt ...
|
After nearly 15 years of denials, Pete Rose has finally come clean and admitted he bet on baseball while manager of the Cincinnati Reds.The career hits leader says in his soon-to-be-released autob ...
|
Just when it seemed that Bud Selig was leaning towards reinstating Pete Rose, published reports have come out claiming that Pete is gambling openly on sports in Las Vegas. Apparently the leopard stil ...
|
Join the latest discussions
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to
Roy Pickering's
Sports Issues topic, please visit the Discussions page.
|