|
|
|
The U.S. Supreme Court will resolve a longstanding legal question within special education later this year, and in doing so the Justices may dramatically alter the shape of the special education process.
The question, taken directly from online Supreme Court documents on the case, seems vaguely tedious: "Whether the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 et. seq., incorporates the customary federal rule that the party that initiates the hearing and seeks relief bears the burden of proof in that proceeding." The technical phrasing and reference to federal rules masks the simplicity of the question. Simply put, the question is this: when parents and school system administration disagree about the appropriateness of an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for a child and parents ask a court to become involved in the process, who has to convince the judge of what? Do the parents have to convince the judge that the IEP is bad for the child? Or, does the school system have to convince the judge that the IEP is good for the child? But before we discuss the legal technicalities any further, let's talk about the actual case the Supreme court has agreed to hear. The following facts are agreed upon by all parties in this case:
The copyright of the article Supreme Court to Hear Special Ed Case in Special Education is owned by . Permission to republish Supreme Court to Hear Special Ed Case in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|